Working Group on Accountability Document

Submitted by I Aizu (with an amendment by J Morris)
As rough consensus, not in precise language:
21.10 In case an ALAC member or Liaison is approaching to fail to meet the requirements, the community should attempt to resolve the problem in an appropriate manner. If this community approach does not work, the Chair will contact the person directly and discuss the matter.
IF these attempts still do not work, the Chair will consult with RALO or NomCom that selected the person for possible actions. In the extreme case, the Chair, in consultation with other ALAC members, will privately encourage the member to resign. If this does not happen by 14 (fourteen) days from that communication, the Chair formally notify the entity responsible for appointing the member, and a message MAY be copied to the public ALAC list, and ask that the appointment is immediately reconsidered.
Liaisons' criteria should also be defined
We also agreed to develop clear job descriptions for each role (including liaisons) that are approved by consensus. The job descriptions should be given to the new ALAC members and Liaisons so that they can understand the expected standard of performance and amount of commitment
See original documents: Email I Aizu Amendement J Morris