GNSO Council Meeting 21 July 2011
Adobe Connect Chat room transcript
Marika Konings: GNSO Council Meeting - 21 July 2011
Marika Konings: This is the link to the agenda on the Confluence wiki
Jeff Neuman: i have another follow up
Jeff Neuman: sorry
Alan Greenberg: trying to get on
Liz Gasster: BTW, feel free to assign a Council liaison tot he Whois service requs survey drafting team if you think that would help, there are no Council members on that group
Jeff Neuman: Centralized WHOIS has nothing to do with transfers
Liz Gasster: Kristina and all - U are right we did not specifiy in the motion, but you all did know that the issues report for UDRP would not meet the bylaws requirements before it was voted on - we should document better but it was fully discussed
Bill Drake: Happy to agree with Jeff
Liz Gasster: This motion was deferre d already I think
Kristina Rosette: @Liz, I know. When I pointed that out to the commenter, he said that should have been documented in the issues report (and I agree).
Jeff Neuman: Liz - this motion has not been deferred
Liz Gasster: last meeting?
Jeff Neuman: it was taken out of the last motion
Jeff Neuman: but perhaps i am wrong about that
Jeff Neuman: we should check
Marika Konings: The item was specifically deferred to this meeting from the meeting in Singapore
Jeff Neuman: The topic was
Jeff Neuman: but was this exact motion made
Marika Konings: yes, this clause was in the initial motion made, but then taken out and replaced by 'the GNSO Council will consider IRTP Part B Recommendation #3 concerning the request of an Issue Report on the requirement of 'thick' WHOIS for all incumbent gTLDs at its next meeting on 21 July.'
Marika Konings: through a friendly amendment
Wendy Seltzer: Liz: re: earlier discussion, when does the WHOIS services group meet?
Wendy Seltzer: (if timing works, I could offer to join/liaise)
Jeff Neuman: so it was taken out of the motion
Bill Drake: Defer, it has evolved
Liz Gasster: @ Wendy, at 1PM US eastern time today
Wendy Seltzer: thanks Liz. That doesn't work for me, but perhaps I could join the list
john berard: Deferring the WhoIs motion does not help solve the problem of staff resource allocation.
Jeff Neuman: John - Absolutely correct
Jeff Neuman: And hopefully by the next meeting we will understand the tradeoffs better with respect to all of the work being requested
Wolf Knoben: Hi all, I'm here!
Kristina Rosette: Here's the language that we had in Singapore on Thick whois: RESOLVED (F), the GNSO Council will consider IRTP Part B Recommendation #3 concerning the request of an Issue Report on the requirement of 'thick' WHOIS for all incumbent gTLDs at its next meeting on 21 July.
Kristina Rosette: So, I'm currently of the view that we've already deferred once
Jamie Wagner: I was disconnected
Kristina Rosette: Thanks , Jeff
Alan Greenberg: There is a GNSO meeting currently scheduloed for Oct 6.
Bill Drake: Not "or two" for me...
Kristina Rosette: really like the webinar idea
Zahid Jamil: maybe there is some work from the STI on GPML that can be re-used here. We could send that work to the GAC for their re-use
Kristina Rosette: GPML? No way. I don't want to go there and don't think anyone else does.
Zahid Jamil: ok
Alan Greenberg: 2nd level is being requested too
Jonathan Robinson: 2nd level, permanent block for key terms as I understand it
Alan Greenberg:and presumably not just identical match, but also name plus other text
Bill Drake: Be still my heart, Jeff!!!
Zahid Jamil: :)
Jonathan Robinson: Primary terms and key, recognised variants I expect
Jonathan Robinson: e.g. olympic, olympics, olympiad
Kristina Rosette: But if we do a group, how and when can it get done? There's no motion here, we don't have another meeting until September.
Jonathan Robinson: OLYMPIC and OLYMPIAD and their primary foreign equivalents as well as PARALYMPIC and PARALYMPIAD are what is desired as fara as I understand it
Alan Greenberg: + 2nd level for 1st round
Zahid Jamil: shouldn't this group be called Consumer Choice,Competition, and Consumer Trust?
Zahid Jamil: Trust and not Innovation - per the AoC
Alan Greenberg: I need to drop off. Thanks all.
Margie Milam: Zahid- the name comes from the original Board resolution
Zahid Jamil: yes the headline but i think we may need clarification on whether we are excluding TRUST from the scope of thie WG or subordinating it somewhat - BC had some concerns - as long as it doesnt - no worries
Margie Milam: Definitely not excluding trust-- and that is part of the charter
Zahid Jamil: thanks!
Bill Drake: Yes to One
Zahid Jamil: open ballot
Zahid Jamil: ?
Jamie Wagner: yes to option 1
Zahid Jamil: AGREED!
Zahid Jamil: end of the transcript
Bill Drake: Stephane: cut and paste
Zahid Jamil: lol!
Wendy Seltzer: Thanks
Zahid Jamil: paste into transcript
Zahid Jamil: good suggestion Wendy!
Wendy Seltzer: Ctrl-A, Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V :)
Bill Drake: Be sure to think of Council every waking hour in August!!!
Zahid Jamil: Thanks Srephane