Please identify yourself when you speak so that the transcribers know to whom they should attribute comments
Listening through the speaker phone is fine, but when you speak please use the handset.
Review and approve agenda
Review of and action on reports from WG subgroups re. the role of reserved names (Members with names in bold font have the lead.)
Guidelines for brief reports
Highlight only new info re. background & info. Resources
Focus primarily on role & expert consultation sections
Discuss role with the intent of reaching WG consensus
Discuss straw recommendations only if your sub-group has reached rough consensus.
Other categories of reserved names
ICANN and IANA related names – Tim Denton, Mawaki Chango
Summary of updates to the report
Consultation with Experts
Role
‘Straw’ recommendations
‘Straw’ recommendations
Single and two-character labels - Mike Rodenbaugh, Neal Blair, Alistair Dixon, Marilyn Cade, Patrick Jones
Summary of updates to the report
Consultation with Experts
Role
‘Straw’ recommendations
Controversial names – Tim Ruiz, Marilyn Cade, Avri Doria
Summary of updates to the report
Consultation with Experts
Role
‘Straw’ recommendations
Geographic and geopolitical names – Mike Palage, Avri Doria, Jon Nevett
Summary of updates to the report
Consultation with Experts
Role
‘Straw’ recommendations
Timeline
Remaining meetings
Thursday, 8 March
Thursday, 15 March
Deadline for approval of final report: 15 March
Report due date to the GNSO Council and Dec05 PDP committee: 16 March
Action items for next call on 8 March
Review the final report template to be distributed by Chuck
For each of the RN reserved name reports:
Complete a near-final draft report including
Near final description of consultation with experts
Final definition of role
Final‘Straw’ recommendations from the subgroup for the full WG.
Attempt to reach rough consensus within the subgroup on the ‘straw’ recommendations
If there is not rough consensus, state alternative recommendations.
In Section 3 of each report, provide recommendation summary in the table format distributed by Chuck on 5 March followed with any appropriate narrative text below the table.
In cases where additional work is recommended, include suggested guidelines for additional work as applicable; this should be inserted after the recommendations summary table along with any other text provided there.
Send revised report to the list and to Glen for posting at least one hour before the 8 March meeting (earlier if possible)
Be prepared to do the following at the 8 March meeting:
Briefly (< 3 minutes) summarize updates to the report
Present ‘straw’ recommendations for discussion and consideration of the full WG
