Last Updated: 28 August 2009
Reserved Names Working Group (RN-WG)
Draft Agenda – Wednesday, 7 March 2007
- Notes:
- Meeting is being recorded and transcribed
- Please identify yourself when you speak so that the transcribers know to whom they should attribute comments
- Listening through the speaker phone is fine, but when you speak please use the handset.
- Review and approve agenda
- Review of and action on reports from WG subgroups re. the role of reserved names (Members with names in bold font have the lead.)
- Guidelines for brief reports
- Highlight only new info re. background & info. Resources
- Focus primarily on role & expert consultation sections
- Discuss role with the intent of reaching WG consensus
- Discuss straw recommendations only if your sub-group has reached rough consensus.
- Other categories of reserved names
- ICANN and IANA related names – Tim Denton, Mawaki Chango
- Summary of updates to the report
- Consultation with Experts
- Role
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- Single and two-character labels - Mike Rodenbaugh, Neal Blair, Alistair Dixon, Marilyn Cade, Patrick Jones
- Summary of updates to the report
- Consultation with Experts
- Role
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- Controversial names – Tim Ruiz, Marilyn Cade, Avri Doria
- Summary of updates to the report
- Consultation with Experts
- Role
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- Geographic and geopolitical names – Mike Palage, Avri Doria, Jon Nevett
- Summary of updates to the report
- Consultation with Experts
- Role
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- Timeline
- Remaining meetings
- Thursday, 8 March
- Thursday, 15 March
- Deadline for approval of final report: 15 March
- Report due date to the GNSO Council and Dec05 PDP committee: 16 March
- Action items for next call on 8 March
- Review the final report template to be distributed by Chuck
- For each of the RN reserved name reports:
- Complete a near-final draft report including
- Near final description of consultation with experts
- Final definition of role
- Final‘Straw’ recommendations from the subgroup for the full WG.
- Attempt to reach rough consensus within the subgroup on the ‘straw’ recommendations
- If there is not rough consensus, state alternative recommendations.
- In Section 3 of each report, provide recommendation summary in the table format distributed by Chuck on 5 March followed with any appropriate narrative text below the table.
- In cases where additional work is recommended, include suggested guidelines for additional work as applicable; this should be inserted after the recommendations summary table along with any other text provided there.
- Send revised report to the list and to Glen for posting at least one hour before the 8 March meeting (earlier if possible)
- Be prepared to do the following at the 8 March meeting:
- Briefly (< 3 minutes) summarize updates to the report
- Present ‘straw’ recommendations for discussion and consideration of the full WG
- Outline steps to finalize report
- Any Other Business
- Next meeting: Thursday, 8 March
- Times:
- Brussels Thu 7:00 PM CET
- Buenos Aires Thu 3:00 PM ART
- Cedar Rapidsw Thu 12:00 Noon CST
- Dublin Thu 6:00 PM GMT
- Hong Kong Fri 2:00 AM HKT
- London Thu 6:00 PM GMT
- Los Angeles Thu 10:00 AM PST
- New York Thu 1:00 PM EST
- Sacramento Thu 10:00 AM PST
- San Francisco Thu 10:00 AM PST
- Seoul Fri 3:00 AM KST
- Taipei Fri 2:00 AM CST
- Toronto Thu 1:00 PM EST
- Virginia/D.C. Thu 1:00 PM EST
- Wellington Fri 7:00 AM NZDT
- Teleconference details to be provided by Glen.
|