Reserved Names Working Group (RN-WG)
Draft Agenda – Thursday, 1 March 2007 v2
- Notes:
- Meeting is being recorded and transcribed
- Please identify yourself when you speak so that the transcribers know to whom they should attribute comments.
- Listening through the speaker phone is fine, but when you speak please use the handset.
- Welcome new members (if any).
- Victoria McEvedy (NCUC)
- Other?
- Review and approve agenda
- Status of Missing Interest statements
- Edmon Chung – received/revision requested by Chair
- Sophia Bekele
- Update on liaisons
- GAC liaison: TBD
- Don’t forget to enlist the support of liaisons in your work as needed:
- Minjung Park , ccNSO
- Sophia Bekele, IDN WG
- Expert consultation with Ram Mohan and Cary Karp (Tina Dam is unable to participate because of travel but will try to send comments via email.)
- Review of and action on reports from WG subgroups re. the role of reserved names (Members with names in bold font have the lead.)
- Guidelines for brief reports
- Highlight only new info re. background & info. Resources
- Focus primarily on role & expert consultation sections
- Discuss straw recommendations only if your sub-group has reached rough consensus.
- Single and two-character labels - Mike Rodenbaugh, Neal Blair, Alistair Dixon, Marilyn Cade, Patrick Jones
- Summary of updates to the report
- Consultation with Experts
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- Discussion
- Possible ‘low hanging fruit’
- Tagged domain names – Chuck/Patrick
- Summary of updates to the report
- Consultation with Experts
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- Discussion
- Approval by WG?
- Minority statements?
- NIC/Whois/www – Tim Denton (Note the change of the category name from ‘ Reservations for Registry operations’)
- Summary of updates to the report
- Consultation with Experts
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- Discussion
- Approval by WG?
- Minority statements?
- ICANN and IANA related names – Tim Denton, Mawaki Chango
- Summary of updates to the report
- Consultation with Experts
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- Discussion
- Names reserved at the third level – Greg Shatan, Dan Dougherty
- Summary of updates to the report
- Consultation with Experts
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- Discussion
- Other categories of reserved names
- Controversial names – Tim Ruiz, Marilyn Cade, Avri Doria
- Summary of updates to the report
- Consultation with Experts
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- Discussion
- Other names reserved at the second-level (gTLD Registry specific names, other) – Caroline Greer, Tamara Reznik, Mike Rodenbaugh
- Summary of updates to the report
- Consultation with Experts
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- Discussion
- Geographic and geopolitical names – Mike Palage, Avri Doria, Jon Nevett
- Summary of updates to the report
- Consultation with Experts
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- Discussion
- Timeline
- Remaining meetings
- Thursday, 8 March
- Thursday, 15 March
- Deadline for approval of final report: 15 March
- Report due date to the GNSO Council and Dec05 PDP committee: 16 March
- Best time for a meeting on 15 March?
- Critical to have maximum participation
- Regular meeting time
- 10:00 PDT, Sacramento/San Francisco
- 12:00 Cedar Rapids
- 13:00 (1:00pm) EST, New York/Washington DC/Ottawa
- 16:00 (4:00pm) Buenos Aires
- 17:00 (5:00pm) UTC, Dublin
- 20:00 (8:00pm) CET Brussels
- 03:00 Hong Kong next day
- 04:00 Seoul next day
- 08:00 Wellington next day
- Note that the GNSO Council has a meeting at 19:00 UTC (2 hours after our regularly scheduled meeting)
- Scheduling of any needed WG expert consultations
- For which categories are consultations with experts with the full working group recommended?
- What experts should be consulted?
- Suggested dates?
- Action items for next call on 8 March
- Chuck: prepare final report template
- Tim Denton: modify any WG-approved reports to ensure common format and editorial quality
- For each of the categories in item 7 above for which reports were not approved by the WG:
- Complete a near-final draft report including
- Consultation with experts (unless full WG consultation is needed)
- ‘Straw’ recommendations
- Attempt to reach rough consensus within the subgroup on the ‘straw’ recommendations
- If there is not rough consensus, state alternative recommendations.
- Send revised report to the list not later than Wednesday, 7 March
- Be prepared to do the following at the 8 March meeting:
- Briefly (< 5 minutes) summarize updates to the report
- Particular emphasis should be given to consultation with experts and ‘straw’ recommendations.
- Outline steps to finalize report
- Any Other Business
- Next meeting: Thursday, 8 March
- Times:
- 10:00 PDT, Sacramento/San Francisco
- 12:00 Cedar Rapids,
- 13:00 (1:00pm) EST, New York/Washington DC/Ottawa
- 16:00 (4:00pm) Buenos Aires
- 17:00 (5:00pm) UTC, Dublin,
- 20:00 (8:00pm) CET Brussels
- 03:00 Hong Kong next day
- 04:00 Seoul next day
- 08:00 Wellington next day
- Teleconference details to be provided by Glen.
|