Re: [ga] [Fwd: [address-policy-wg] ICANN Ratifies Global Policy for Allocation of IPv6 Address Space]

["kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I suppose that our forefathers should have treated England with that same
respect instead of going off and forcing them out of the country and forming
a new government.

Yes the analogy fits. It was about taxation without representation which is
exactly what we have with ICANN.

So that makes ICANN the oppressor in this instance. Shall we be nice to a
group that refuses to do things in a bottom up and transparent manner?

Nice has gotten us nothing but the same from ICANN for years. When is there
ever a time when nice is no longer used? When it doesn't work Veni.

Question: Has there been one proposal brought up on this list that you have
personally brought up at a board meeting? If so which one and what was the
result please?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Veni Markovski" <veni@xxxxxxxx>
To: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 8:17 AM
Subject: Re: [ga] [Fwd: [address-policy-wg] ICANN Ratifies Global Policy for
Allocation of IPv6 Address Space]


> Hi, Ted.
>
> I don't think that I expect a fan club. If I needed one, I'd have
> gone into the show industry. What I will keep on telling people on
> this list, is that they should just behave like grown-up and educated
> persons. It's easy to insult someone; it's much more difficult to ask
> for pardon. I don't see a reason why someone should attack Thomas for
> his e-mail.
>
> The criticism should always be with some aim, it's not wise to have
> the criticism itself as an aim.
>
> I have learnt in some ocasions more from constructive criticism than
> from reports - but I've never learnt anything from criticism made
> with anger and without any constructive proposals in it.
>
> veni
>
>
> At 07:20 AM 14.9.2006 '?.'  -0400, Prophet Partners Inc. wrote:
> >Hi Veni,
> >
> >We're certain that you would agree that the people that participate at
this
> >forum are here to discuss ICANN issues that concern them. Given that GA
> >subscribers have different agendas, there is certain to be controversy in
> >various discussions. ICANN does some things well, which can be left
alone.
> >This isn't a pep rally with everyone cheering for the same thing. The
other
> >issues that require improvement are the main topics of discussion here.
> >
> >Contrary to what you may believe or expect, this is also not an ICANN fan
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Veni Markovski
> http://www.veni.com
>
> check also my blog:
> http://blog.veni.com
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.3/447 - Release Date: 9/13/06
>
>