<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] [Fwd: [address-policy-wg] ICANN Ratifies Global Policy for Allocation of IPv6 Address Space]
- To: Veni Markovski <veni@xxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] [Fwd: [address-policy-wg] ICANN Ratifies Global Policy for Allocation of IPv6 Address Space]
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 06:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=wjVmyIsvgwp0/v2IqYMWghe5lti6D9w/8hPCy3ZXCtsiECb9GvtYZ2MCzx55nDc5F2y+TWpKfgXQApzbVgT27/T2cdKMceGrU96rBnp4Z/cwYpl3sUtiQKmFjhEgT8IlKPcJBgbRIW4c64YHPOZZ9SDCIe6Y/co6KN2q6PF24Kk= ;
- In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.2.20060914081737.062e2f10@veni.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A quick review of the archives will show that when criticized (nicely or not so nicely) BoD members leave the discussions of this list. They cannot stand the heat it would appear. I see the one exception being Karl during his tenure, Dyson used to do "drive by" visits, and recently Palage has really stuck to it.
But I believe only a handfull are even subscribed to this list.
e
Veni Markovski <veni@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, Ted.
I don't think that I expect a fan club. If I needed one, I'd have
gone into the show industry. What I will keep on telling people on
this list, is that they should just behave like grown-up and educated
persons. It's easy to insult someone; it's much more difficult to ask
for pardon. I don't see a reason why someone should attack Thomas for
his e-mail.
The criticism should always be with some aim, it's not wise to have
the criticism itself as an aim.
I have learnt in some ocasions more from constructive criticism than
from reports - but I've never learnt anything from criticism made
with anger and without any constructive proposals in it.
veni
At 07:20 AM 14.9.2006 '?.' -0400, Prophet Partners Inc. wrote:
>Hi Veni,
>
>We're certain that you would agree that the people that participate at this
>forum are here to discuss ICANN issues that concern them. Given that GA
>subscribers have different agendas, there is certain to be controversy in
>various discussions. ICANN does some things well, which can be left alone.
>This isn't a pep rally with everyone cheering for the same thing. The other
>issues that require improvement are the main topics of discussion here.
>
>Contrary to what you may believe or expect, this is also not an ICANN fan
Sincerely,
Veni Markovski
http://www.veni.com
check also my blog:
http://blog.veni.com
---------------------------------
Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com. Check it out.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|