ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] RE: GA irrelevant

  • To: "ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> GA" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] RE: GA irrelevant
  • From: Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 18:27:36 -0500


I trust ICANN will be funding this from the per-domain tax already paid by 
Registrants?

On May 12, 2010, at 4:50 PM, Roberto Gaetano wrote:

> 
> Sotiris:
> 
>> 
>> So, why don't you tell us, finally, how we should go about 
>> organizing ourselves in a manner that would be acceptable. 
>> Please be as specific as possible.
> 
> I thought I already did.
> Since the changes to the GNSO structure, proposed by the GNSO Review WG and
> the SIC, have been approved by the Board, there is the concrete possibility
> of creating a constituency for registrants. Creation of new constituencies
> has even been encouraged last year.
> This is a new opportunity, something that did not exist in the past.
> It is now up to the registrants on this list or anywhere else to decide
> whether they want to take advantage of this opportunity or not.
> 
> Cheers,
> Roberto
> 





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>