Re: [ga] RE: GA irrelevant

[sotiris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Yes, Roberto, please answer Andy's question and then please revisit my
question on SPECIFICS: How must registrants organize themselves in a
manner that will be acceptable to ICANN? Will ICANN fund a voting
mechanism, for instance?

Sotiris Sotiropoulos

Andy Gardner wrote:
> I trust ICANN will be funding this from the per-domain tax already paid by
> Registrants?
>
> On May 12, 2010, at 4:50 PM, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>
>>
>> Sotiris:
>>
>>>
>>> So, why don't you tell us, finally, how we should go about
>>> organizing ourselves in a manner that would be acceptable.
>>> Please be as specific as possible.
>>
>> I thought I already did.
>> Since the changes to the GNSO structure, proposed by the GNSO Review WG
>> and
>> the SIC, have been approved by the Board, there is the concrete
>> possibility
>> of creating a constituency for registrants. Creation of new
>> constituencies
>> has even been encouraged last year.
>> This is a new opportunity, something that did not exist in the past.
>> It is now up to the registrants on this list or anywhere else to decide
>> whether they want to take advantage of this opportunity or not.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Roberto
>>
>
>
>