<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
AW: WG: [council] Re: Reminder / Tuesday 14 June 2011 @ 1300 UTC / JAS WG - Board - GAC proposed June 7 meeting
- To: <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, <william.drake@xxxxxx>
- Subject: AW: WG: [council] Re: Reminder / Tuesday 14 June 2011 @ 1300 UTC / JAS WG - Board - GAC proposed June 7 meeting
- From: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:17:17 +0200
- Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <kstouray@xxxxxxxxx>, <graham@xxxxxxxx>, <Rita.Rodin@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>, <ocl@xxxxxxx>, <alac-internal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>, <gacsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <425968EC-272B-4507-876B-B68ADDC73333@indom.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <BE59E361A889C84F94D104184F3F8B00034FECC5@s4de8dsaanm.west.t-com.de> <A570A3F8-6604-4017-A7AB-1C442554B5CC@uzh.ch> <5DC64A56-163C-4D73-AE5F-2A2E012804B6@indom.com> <9A67D236-DB53-4EF7-A3A4-1005061BDAE5@uzh.ch> <425968EC-272B-4507-876B-B68ADDC73333@indom.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acwrc77ns6FgFr17QyGHj+GVTauX/QAAqj7Q
- Thread-topic: WG: [council] Re: Reminder / Tuesday 14 June 2011 @ 1300 UTC / JAS WG - Board - GAC proposed June 7 meeting
Bill,
now I understand that my English may have confused you. I was writing about the
"GNSO position within this process..." meaning the process of developing the
motion. It was my personal opinion and not meaning that Stéphane's comment was
the GNSO's position.
Sorry if I mislead you.
Kind regards
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
Von: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011 17:49
An: William Drake
Cc: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich; GNSO Council List; Touray, Katim; Graham,
Bill; Rita Johnston Rodin; Bruce Tonkin; "Géry de Saint, Glen"; Carlton SAMUELS
A; Rafik Dammak; Crepin-Leblond, Olivier; ICANN (Internal) list ALAC; Karla
Valente; gacsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: WG: [council] Re: Reminder / Tuesday 14 June 2011 @ 1300
UTC / JAS WG - Board - GAC proposed June 7 meeting
Thanks for clarifying Bill.
I think we can agree that we agree ;)
Can I say "please no" to your suggestion for a month-long debate? ;))
Stéphane
Le 15 juin 2011 à 16:49, William Drake a écrit :
Hi Stéphane
Right, I didn't question that it was a personal statement, and
indeed I noted that in the first sentence of my reply. I was responding to
Wolf-Ulrich's message saying you'd made clear "the GNSO position" and simply
underscoring that there's no singular view in the Council. So can we agree
that we agree, or shall we have a month long Council debate on the procedures
to be followed in determining whether we agree? :-)
Onward and upward,
Bill
On Jun 15, 2011, at 8:21 PM, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
Bill,
My message was a personal response and clearly marked
in this way.
You are absolutely right that it should in no way be
construed as a GNSO position.
But to be honest, I think that was very clearly stated
in my message.
Stéphane
Le 15 juin 2011 à 03:14, William Drake a écrit :
Hi
While one can differ with the some of the word
choices in the message to which Stéphane has responded in his personal
capacity, it should be noted that the sort of optical concerns that were raised
are share among at least some in Council who've supported the JAS effort. As
such, I would not characterize the situation as there being a singular "GNSO
position" on this. There's a majority view and there's a minority view, not
full consensus, and I hope we can keep that clear in future references to the
matter.
Thanks,
Bill
On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:57 PM,
<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Stéphane,
I've put Bill Graham as the 3rd GNSO
elected board member on cc.
Great message, making the entire
process and the GNSO position within this process very clear!
Kind regards
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Stéphane Van Gelder
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011 10:48
An: Katim S. Touray; GNSO Council List;
Peter Dengate Thrush; Rita Rodin Johnston; Bruce Tonkin
Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff; Secretary;
Jeremy Beale; Glen de Saint Géry; Karla Valente; Carlton Samuels; Rafik Dammak;
ALAC EXCOM; Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
Betreff: [council] Re: Reminder /
Tuesday 14 June 2011 @ 1300 UTC / JAS WG - Board - GAC proposed June 7 meeting
Hello Katim,
This is a personal reaction to your
message.
I am, frankly, aghast that a Board
member would send a message indicating that one of ICANN's SOs has been "slow"
in acting on a report, in the way you portray the GNSO as having acted with
regards to the JAS Milestone Report.
At best, this shows a lack of
understanding of the basic process that our SO is committed to following, by
its own bylaws and by the ICANN bylaws. Immediately after the JAS had forwarded
its report to us, it was considered by the GNSO Council at its next meeting.
During that meeting, one of the GNSO groups requested the motion be deferred
for one meeting. We have a long-standing custom of entertaining such requests.
Hence the GNSO considered the motion again at its June 9 meeting, where I am
happy to say that the motion (requesting, among other things, that the report
be put out for public comment asap) was approved unanimously by the Council.
Regardless of your personal interests,
I would think that one of your duties as a Board member is to uphold the
organisation's bylaws, to respect its SOs and to uphold the processes under
which they work.
Implying in your message that the GNSO
is attempting to scuttle the "entire process of seeking ways... to provide
support to needy new gTLD applicants" is not only untrue (as our unanimous vote
shows), it is also a serious disregard of the way ICANN and its SOs work.
ICANN's bottom-up process is not "pick and choose". Just because, on this issue
that you care strongly about, you feel that things are not moving fast enough,
this does not justify false allegations of possible attempts by one SO to
"scuttle the process".
As your message was sent in the context
of a call with the Board, the GAC, Staff and ALAC, I consider it very public.
Hence it could also be construed as an attempt to discredit the hard work being
done by the community of volunteers that the GNSO represents.
You request suggestions to the Board
"to ensure that progress cannot be hijacked by inaction by any party" (and this
is clearly aimed at the GNSO in this case). I would offer one: don't hijack
ICANN's core process of working through its SOs and ACs towards the Board! I
take your message to be a breach of that process and would personally
appreciate reassurance from you that I am mistaken, and that is not what you
intend.
In order to initiate possible
discussion on this at both Council and Board level, I am copying the GNSO
Council, Peter as Chairman of the Board and the two GNSO-elected Board members
for their possible comments.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 14 juin 2011 à 01:33, Katim S.
Touray a écrit :
Dear all,
Thanks so much for your invitation to
the call. I certainly was looking forward to joining you on the call, but
unfortunately, I have a serious conflict that only came up earlier today (Mon.)
I am a consultant helping prepare a strategic action plan for our Fisheries
Department in The Gambia, and we were in a workshop all day today discussing a
draft plan I presented a few weeks back. We were hoping to go through the
entire document today, but we could not. So we agreed to meet again tomorrow
to complete our review of the draft document. For this reason, I will not be
available to join the call tomorrow, and I am most disappointed by this.
Having said that, I hope you have a
successful meeting tomorrow. In addition, I would like to say that I hope your
recommendations receive the proper attention they deserve, and that in the end,
needy new gTLD applicants get the support they need.
One issue I would like you to discuss
on the call is the timeline for the finalization of the JAS WG report. While I
agree that it will help to insist that the AG mention that needy applicants
should seek support through the process based the JAS WG report, I think it
will help to provide a timeline for the finalization of your report.
I'm also troubled by the fact that the
GNSO has been rather slow in acting on the JAS WG reports. I fear such a
situation might well be construed by many as an effort by the GNSO to scuttle
the entire process of seeking ways and means to provide support to needy new
gTLD applicants. One important product of such a perception would be that
developing countries will feel that ICANN is not sincere when it says (as the
Board did in Nairobi last year) that it is interested in launching an inclusive
new gTLD program. I need not say that such a perception will also harm ICANN's
efforts to strengthen relations with developing countries, and get them on our
side on the many issues we'd like to have their support. For this reason, I
would like hear what suggestions you have to the board to ensure that progress
cannot be hijacked by inaction by any party.
Finally, let me say a big "Thank you!!"
again to all of you for your tireless and selfless efforts on this matter.
Again, I am very sorry I would not be able to join your call, and best wishes
in your deliberations.
Have a great week, and safe travels to
Singapore!
Sincerely,
Katim
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 4:35 PM, ICANN
At-Large Staff <staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear All,
The JAS Working Group Call with members
of the Board, GAC and GNSO invited, is scheduled on Tuesday, 14 June 2001, at
13:00 UTC. We hope you will be able to join us.
PROPOSED AGENDA:
* Introduction (5 to 10 minutes)
Evan Leibovitch - Highlights Second Milestone Report covering short history
how it was developed and specific summary points
* Board/GAC questions/comments
(30 to 40 minutes) - JAS WG would like to listen to individual feedback and
receive questions/suggestions from GAC and Board members
* Singapore (5 to 10 minutes)
Rafik Dammak/Carlton Samuels - Should there be a public meeting with the JAS WG
GAC/Board members during the Singapore ICANN Meeting?
As a reminder, it would help the JAS WG
to better prepare if you could:
1. Advise on the representatives
from the Board and GAC that will be able to attend the teleconference.
2. Send us any questions or
comments on the Milestone Report in advance, if possible.
Kind regards,
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
ALAC Chair
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dial-in details: Tuesday 14 June 2011
at 13:00 UTC
For other places see:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=JAS+WG&iso=20110607T13
<http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=JAS+WG&iso=20110607T13>
ADOBE CONNECT:
http://icann.adobeconnect.com/jas/
<http://icann.adobeconnect.com/jas/>
Wiki Workspace:
https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/SO-AC+New+gTLD+Applicant+Support+Working+Group+%28JAS-WG%29
<https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/SO-AC+New+gTLD+Applicant+Support+Working+Group+%28JAS-WG%29>
If you require a dial-out, please email
staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> with you preferred
contact number.
____________________________________________________________________________
Participant passcode: JAS
For security reasons, the passcode will
be required to join the call.
____________________________________________________________________________
Dial in numbers:
Country
Toll Numbers Freephone/Toll Free Number
ARGENTINA
0800-777-0519
AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE:
61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260
AUSTRALIA BRISBANE:
61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260
AUSTRALIA CANBERRA:
61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260
AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE:
61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260
AUSTRALIA PERTH:
61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260
AUSTRALIA SYDNEY:
61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260
AUSTRIA
43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259
BELGIUM
32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795
BRAZIL
0800-7610651
CHILE
1230-020-2863
CHINA*
86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670
10800-120-1670
COLOMBIA
01800-9-156474
CZECH REPUBLIC
420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177
DENMARK
45-7014-0284 8088-8324
ESTONIA
800-011-1093
FINLAND Land Line:
106-33-203 0-800-9-14610
FINLAND Mobile:
09-106-33-203 0-800-9-14610
FRANCE LYON:
33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496
FRANCE MARSEILLE:
33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496
FRANCE PARIS:
33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496
GERMANY
49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247
GREECE
30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312
HONG KONG
852-3001-3863 800-962-856
HUNGARY
06-800-12755
INDIA
000-800-852-1268
INDONESIA
001-803-011-3982
IRELAND
353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368
ISRAEL
1-80-9216162
ITALY
39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383
JAPAN OSAKA:
81-6-7739-4799 0066-33-132439
JAPAN TOKYO:
81-3-5539-5191 0066-33-132439
LATVIA
8000-3185
LUXEMBOURG
352-27-000-1364
MALAYSIA
1-800-81-3065
MEXICO
001-866-376-9696
NETHERLANDS
31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378
NEW ZEALAND
64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722
NORWAY
47-21-590-062 800-15157
PANAMA
011-001-800-5072065
PERU
0800-53713
PHILIPPINES
63-2-858-3716
POLAND
00-800-1212572
PORTUGAL
8008-14052
RUSSIA
8-10-8002-0144011
SINGAPORE
65-6883-9230 800-120-4663
SLOVAK REPUBLIC
421-2-322-422-25
SOUTH AFRICA
080-09-80414
SOUTH KOREA
82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352
SPAIN
34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053
SWEDEN
46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622
SWITZERLAND
41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032
TAIWAN
886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797
THAILAND
001-800-1206-66056
UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM:
44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029
UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW:
44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029
UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS:
44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029
UNITED KINGDOM LONDON:
44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029
UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER:
44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029
URUGUAY
000-413-598-3421
USA
1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726
VENEZUELA
0800-1-00-3702
*Access to your conference call will be
either of the numbers listed, dependent on the participants' local telecom
provider.
Restrictions may exist when accessing
freephone/toll free numbers using a mobile telephone.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|