<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: WG: [council] Re: Reminder / Tuesday 14 June 2011 @ 1300 UTC / JAS WG - Board - GAC proposed June 7 meeting
- To: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: WG: [council] Re: Reminder / Tuesday 14 June 2011 @ 1300 UTC / JAS WG - Board - GAC proposed June 7 meeting
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:21:45 +0200
- Cc: "KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Touray, Katim" <kstouray@xxxxxxxxx>, "Graham, Bill" <graham@xxxxxxxx>, Rita Johnston Rodin <Rita.Rodin@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Géry de Saint, Glen" <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, Carlton SAMUELS A <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>, "Crepin-Leblond, Olivier" <ocl@xxxxxxx>, "ICANN (Internal) list ALAC" <alac-internal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>, gacsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
- In-reply-to: <A570A3F8-6604-4017-A7AB-1C442554B5CC@uzh.ch>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <BE59E361A889C84F94D104184F3F8B00034FECC5@s4de8dsaanm.west.t-com.de> <A570A3F8-6604-4017-A7AB-1C442554B5CC@uzh.ch>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bill,
My message was a personal response and clearly marked in this way.
You are absolutely right that it should in no way be construed as a GNSO
position.
But to be honest, I think that was very clearly stated in my message.
Stéphane
Le 15 juin 2011 à 03:14, William Drake a écrit :
> Hi
>
> While one can differ with the some of the word choices in the message to
> which Stéphane has responded in his personal capacity, it should be noted
> that the sort of optical concerns that were raised are share among at least
> some in Council who've supported the JAS effort. As such, I would not
> characterize the situation as there being a singular "GNSO position" on this.
> There's a majority view and there's a minority view, not full consensus, and
> I hope we can keep that clear in future references to the matter.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bill
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:57 PM, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Stéphane,
>>
>> I've put Bill Graham as the 3rd GNSO elected board member on cc.
>>
>> Great message, making the entire process and the GNSO position within this
>> process very clear!
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>
>> Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
>> Auftrag von Stéphane Van Gelder
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011 10:48
>> An: Katim S. Touray; GNSO Council List; Peter Dengate Thrush; Rita Rodin
>> Johnston; Bruce Tonkin
>> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff; Secretary; Jeremy Beale; Glen de Saint Géry; Karla
>> Valente; Carlton Samuels; Rafik Dammak; ALAC EXCOM; Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
>> Betreff: [council] Re: Reminder / Tuesday 14 June 2011 @ 1300 UTC / JAS WG -
>> Board - GAC proposed June 7 meeting
>>
>> Hello Katim,
>>
>> This is a personal reaction to your message.
>>
>> I am, frankly, aghast that a Board member would send a message indicating
>> that one of ICANN's SOs has been "slow" in acting on a report, in the way
>> you portray the GNSO as having acted with regards to the JAS Milestone
>> Report.
>>
>> At best, this shows a lack of understanding of the basic process that our SO
>> is committed to following, by its own bylaws and by the ICANN bylaws.
>> Immediately after the JAS had forwarded its report to us, it was considered
>> by the GNSO Council at its next meeting. During that meeting, one of the
>> GNSO groups requested the motion be deferred for one meeting. We have a
>> long-standing custom of entertaining such requests. Hence the GNSO
>> considered the motion again at its June 9 meeting, where I am happy to say
>> that the motion (requesting, among other things, that the report be put out
>> for public comment asap) was approved unanimously by the Council.
>>
>> Regardless of your personal interests, I would think that one of your duties
>> as a Board member is to uphold the organisation's bylaws, to respect its SOs
>> and to uphold the processes under which they work.
>>
>> Implying in your message that the GNSO is attempting to scuttle the "entire
>> process of seeking ways... to provide support to needy new gTLD applicants"
>> is not only untrue (as our unanimous vote shows), it is also a serious
>> disregard of the way ICANN and its SOs work. ICANN's bottom-up process is
>> not "pick and choose". Just because, on this issue that you care strongly
>> about, you feel that things are not moving fast enough, this does not
>> justify false allegations of possible attempts by one SO to "scuttle the
>> process".
>>
>> As your message was sent in the context of a call with the Board, the GAC,
>> Staff and ALAC, I consider it very public. Hence it could also be construed
>> as an attempt to discredit the hard work being done by the community of
>> volunteers that the GNSO represents.
>>
>> You request suggestions to the Board "to ensure that progress cannot be
>> hijacked by inaction by any party" (and this is clearly aimed at the GNSO in
>> this case). I would offer one: don't hijack ICANN's core process of working
>> through its SOs and ACs towards the Board! I take your message to be a
>> breach of that process and would personally appreciate reassurance from you
>> that I am mistaken, and that is not what you intend.
>>
>> In order to initiate possible discussion on this at both Council and Board
>> level, I am copying the GNSO Council, Peter as Chairman of the Board and the
>> two GNSO-elected Board members for their possible comments.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Stéphane
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 14 juin 2011 à 01:33, Katim S. Touray a écrit :
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> Thanks so much for your invitation to the call. I certainly was looking
>>> forward to joining you on the call, but unfortunately, I have a serious
>>> conflict that only came up earlier today (Mon.) I am a consultant helping
>>> prepare a strategic action plan for our Fisheries Department in The Gambia,
>>> and we were in a workshop all day today discussing a draft plan I presented
>>> a few weeks back. We were hoping to go through the entire document today,
>>> but we could not. So we agreed to meet again tomorrow to complete our
>>> review of the draft document. For this reason, I will not be available to
>>> join the call tomorrow, and I am most disappointed by this.
>>>
>>> Having said that, I hope you have a successful meeting tomorrow. In
>>> addition, I would like to say that I hope your recommendations receive the
>>> proper attention they deserve, and that in the end, needy new gTLD
>>> applicants get the support they need.
>>>
>>> One issue I would like you to discuss on the call is the timeline for the
>>> finalization of the JAS WG report. While I agree that it will help to
>>> insist that the AG mention that needy applicants should seek support
>>> through the process based the JAS WG report, I think it will help to
>>> provide a timeline for the finalization of your report.
>>>
>>> I'm also troubled by the fact that the GNSO has been rather slow in acting
>>> on the JAS WG reports. I fear such a situation might well be construed by
>>> many as an effort by the GNSO to scuttle the entire process of seeking ways
>>> and means to provide support to needy new gTLD applicants. One important
>>> product of such a perception would be that developing countries will feel
>>> that ICANN is not sincere when it says (as the Board did in Nairobi last
>>> year) that it is interested in launching an inclusive new gTLD program. I
>>> need not say that such a perception will also harm ICANN's efforts to
>>> strengthen relations with developing countries, and get them on our side on
>>> the many issues we'd like to have their support. For this reason, I would
>>> like hear what suggestions you have to the board to ensure that progress
>>> cannot be hijacked by inaction by any party.
>>>
>>> Finally, let me say a big "Thank you!!" again to all of you for your
>>> tireless and selfless efforts on this matter. Again, I am very sorry I
>>> would not be able to join your call, and best wishes in your deliberations.
>>>
>>> Have a great week, and safe travels to Singapore!
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Katim
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 4:35 PM, ICANN At-Large Staff
>>> <staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> The JAS Working Group Call with members of the Board, GAC and GNSO invited,
>>> is scheduled on Tuesday, 14 June 2001, at 13:00 UTC. We hope you will be
>>> able to join us.
>>>
>>> PROPOSED AGENDA:
>>> Introduction (5 to 10 minutes) Evan Leibovitch - Highlights Second
>>> Milestone Report covering short history how it was developed and specific
>>> summary points
>>> Board/GAC questions/comments (30 to 40 minutes) – JAS WG would like to
>>> listen to individual feedback and receive questions/suggestions from GAC
>>> and Board members
>>> Singapore (5 to 10 minutes) Rafik Dammak/Carlton Samuels – Should there be
>>> a public meeting with the JAS WG GAC/Board members during the Singapore
>>> ICANN Meeting?
>>> As a reminder, it would help the JAS WG to better prepare if you could:
>>> Advise on the representatives from the Board and GAC that will be able to
>>> attend the teleconference.
>>> Send us any questions or comments on the Milestone Report in advance, if
>>> possible.
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
>>>
>>> ALAC Chair
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Dial-in details: Tuesday 14 June 2011 at 13:00 UTC
>>>
>>> For other places see:
>>>
>>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=JAS+WG&iso=20110607T13
>>>
>>> ADOBE CONNECT:
>>> http://icann.adobeconnect.com/jas/
>>>
>>> Wiki Workspace:
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/SO-AC+New+gTLD+Applicant+Support+Working+Group+%28JAS-WG%29
>>>
>>> If you require a dial-out, please email staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with you
>>> preferred contact number.
>>> ____________________________________________________________________________
>>> Participant passcode: JAS
>>>
>>> For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call.
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________________________
>>> Dial in numbers:
>>> Country Toll Numbers Freephone/Toll
>>> Free Number
>>>
>>> ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519
>>> AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260
>>> AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260
>>> AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260
>>> AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260
>>> AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260
>>> AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260
>>> AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259
>>> BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795
>>> BRAZIL 0800-7610651
>>> CHILE 1230-020-2863
>>> CHINA* 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670
>>> 10800-120-1670
>>> COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474
>>> CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177
>>> DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324
>>> ESTONIA 800-011-1093
>>> FINLAND Land Line: 106-33-203 0-800-9-14610
>>> FINLAND Mobile: 09-106-33-203 0-800-9-14610
>>> FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496
>>> FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496
>>> FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496
>>> GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247
>>> GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312
>>> HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856
>>> HUNGARY 06-800-12755
>>> INDIA 000-800-852-1268
>>> INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982
>>> IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368
>>> ISRAEL 1-80-9216162
>>> ITALY 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383
>>> JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7739-4799 0066-33-132439
>>> JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-5539-5191 0066-33-132439
>>> LATVIA 8000-3185
>>> LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364
>>> MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065
>>> MEXICO 001-866-376-9696
>>> NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378
>>> NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722
>>> NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157
>>> PANAMA
>>> 011-001-800-5072065
>>> PERU 0800-53713
>>> PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716
>>> POLAND 00-800-1212572
>>> PORTUGAL 8008-14052
>>> RUSSIA
>>> 8-10-8002-0144011
>>> SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663
>>> SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25
>>> SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414
>>> SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352
>>> SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053
>>> SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622
>>> SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032
>>> TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797
>>> THAILAND
>>> 001-800-1206-66056
>>> UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029
>>> UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029
>>> UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029
>>> UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029
>>> UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029
>>> URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421
>>> USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726
>>> VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702
>>>
>>>
>>> *Access to your conference call will be either of the numbers listed,
>>> dependent on the participants' local telecom provider.
>>>
>>>
>>> Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a
>>> mobile telephone.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|