ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: WG: [council] Re: Reminder / Tuesday 14 June 2011 @ 1300 UTC / JAS WG - Board - GAC proposed June 7 meeting

  • To: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: WG: [council] Re: Reminder / Tuesday 14 June 2011 @ 1300 UTC / JAS WG - Board - GAC proposed June 7 meeting
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:21:45 +0200
  • Cc: "KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Touray, Katim" <kstouray@xxxxxxxxx>, "Graham, Bill" <graham@xxxxxxxx>, Rita Johnston Rodin <Rita.Rodin@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Géry de Saint, Glen" <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, Carlton SAMUELS A <carlton.samuels@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>, "Crepin-Leblond, Olivier" <ocl@xxxxxxx>, "ICANN (Internal) list ALAC" <alac-internal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>, gacsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
  • In-reply-to: <A570A3F8-6604-4017-A7AB-1C442554B5CC@uzh.ch>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <BE59E361A889C84F94D104184F3F8B00034FECC5@s4de8dsaanm.west.t-com.de> <A570A3F8-6604-4017-A7AB-1C442554B5CC@uzh.ch>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Bill,

My message was a personal response and clearly marked in this way.

You are absolutely right that it should in no way be construed as a GNSO 
position.

But to be honest, I think that was very clearly stated in my message.

Stéphane



Le 15 juin 2011 à 03:14, William Drake a écrit :

> Hi
> 
> While one can differ with the some of the word choices in the message to 
> which Stéphane has responded in his personal capacity, it should be noted 
> that the sort of optical concerns that were raised are share among at least 
> some in Council who've supported the JAS effort.  As such, I would not 
> characterize the situation as there being a singular "GNSO position" on this. 
>  There's a majority view and there's a minority view, not full consensus, and 
> I hope we can keep that clear in future references to the matter.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill
> 
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:57 PM, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Stéphane,
>>  
>> I've put Bill Graham as the 3rd GNSO elected board member on cc.
>>  
>> Great message, making the entire process and the GNSO position within this 
>> process very clear!
>>  
>> Kind regards
>> Wolf-Ulrich
>> 
>> Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im 
>> Auftrag von Stéphane Van Gelder
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011 10:48
>> An: Katim S. Touray; GNSO Council List; Peter Dengate Thrush; Rita Rodin 
>> Johnston; Bruce Tonkin
>> Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff; Secretary; Jeremy Beale; Glen de Saint Géry; Karla 
>> Valente; Carlton Samuels; Rafik Dammak; ALAC EXCOM; Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
>> Betreff: [council] Re: Reminder / Tuesday 14 June 2011 @ 1300 UTC / JAS WG - 
>> Board - GAC proposed June 7 meeting
>> 
>> Hello Katim,
>> 
>> This is a personal reaction to your message.
>> 
>> I am, frankly, aghast that a Board member would send a message indicating 
>> that one of ICANN's SOs has been "slow" in acting on a report, in the way 
>> you portray the GNSO as having acted with regards to the JAS Milestone 
>> Report.
>> 
>> At best, this shows a lack of understanding of the basic process that our SO 
>> is committed to following, by its own bylaws and by the ICANN bylaws. 
>> Immediately after the JAS had forwarded its report to us, it was considered 
>> by the GNSO Council at its next meeting. During that meeting, one of the 
>> GNSO groups requested the motion be deferred for one meeting. We have a 
>> long-standing custom of entertaining such requests. Hence the GNSO 
>> considered the motion again at its June 9 meeting, where I am happy to say 
>> that the motion (requesting, among other things, that the report be put out 
>> for public comment asap) was approved unanimously by the Council.
>> 
>> Regardless of your personal interests, I would think that one of your duties 
>> as a Board member is to uphold the organisation's bylaws, to respect its SOs 
>> and to uphold the processes under which they work.
>> 
>> Implying in your message that the GNSO is attempting to scuttle the "entire 
>> process of seeking ways... to provide support to needy new gTLD applicants" 
>> is not only untrue (as our unanimous vote shows), it is also a serious 
>> disregard of the way ICANN and its SOs work. ICANN's bottom-up process is 
>> not "pick and choose". Just because, on this issue that you care strongly 
>> about, you feel that things are not moving fast enough, this does not 
>> justify false allegations of possible attempts by one SO to "scuttle the 
>> process".
>> 
>> As your message was sent in the context of a call with the Board, the GAC, 
>> Staff and ALAC, I consider it very public. Hence it could also be construed 
>> as an attempt to discredit the hard work being done by the community of 
>> volunteers that the GNSO represents.
>> 
>> You request suggestions to the Board "to ensure that progress cannot be 
>> hijacked by inaction by any party" (and this is clearly aimed at the GNSO in 
>> this case). I would offer one: don't hijack ICANN's core process of working 
>> through its SOs and ACs towards the Board! I take your message to be a 
>> breach of that process and would personally appreciate reassurance from you 
>> that I am mistaken, and that is not what you intend.
>> 
>> In order to initiate possible discussion on this at both Council and Board 
>> level, I am copying the GNSO Council, Peter as Chairman of the Board and the 
>> two GNSO-elected Board members for their possible comments.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Stéphane
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Le 14 juin 2011 à 01:33, Katim S. Touray a écrit :
>> 
>>> Dear all,
>>> 
>>> Thanks so much for your invitation to the call.  I certainly was looking 
>>> forward to joining you on the call, but unfortunately, I have a serious 
>>> conflict that only came up earlier today (Mon.)  I am a consultant helping 
>>> prepare a strategic action plan for our Fisheries Department in The Gambia, 
>>> and we were in a workshop all day today discussing a draft plan I presented 
>>> a few weeks back.  We were hoping to go through the entire document today, 
>>> but we could not.  So we agreed to meet again tomorrow to complete our 
>>> review of the draft document.  For this reason, I will not be available to 
>>> join the call tomorrow, and I am most disappointed by this.
>>> 
>>> Having said that, I hope you have a successful meeting tomorrow.  In 
>>> addition, I would like to say that I hope your recommendations receive the 
>>> proper attention they deserve, and that in the end, needy new gTLD 
>>> applicants get the support they need.
>>> 
>>> One issue I would like you to discuss on the call is the timeline for the 
>>> finalization of the JAS WG report.  While I agree that it will help to 
>>> insist that the AG mention that needy applicants should seek support 
>>> through the process based the JAS WG report, I think it will help to 
>>> provide a timeline for the finalization of your report.
>>> 
>>> I'm also troubled by the fact that the GNSO has been rather slow in acting 
>>> on the JAS WG reports.  I fear such a situation might well be construed by 
>>> many as an effort by the GNSO to scuttle the entire process of seeking ways 
>>> and means to provide support to needy new gTLD applicants.  One important 
>>> product of such a perception would be that developing countries will feel 
>>> that ICANN is not sincere when it says (as the Board did in Nairobi last 
>>> year) that it is interested in launching an inclusive new gTLD program.  I 
>>> need not say that such a perception will also harm ICANN's efforts to 
>>> strengthen relations with developing countries, and get them on our side on 
>>> the many issues we'd like to have their support.  For this reason, I would 
>>> like hear what suggestions you have to the board to ensure that progress 
>>> cannot be hijacked by inaction by any party.
>>> 
>>> Finally, let me say a big "Thank you!!" again to all of you for your 
>>> tireless and selfless efforts on this matter.  Again, I am very sorry I 
>>> would not be able to join your call, and best wishes in your deliberations.
>>> 
>>> Have a great week, and safe travels to Singapore!
>>> 
>>> Sincerely,
>>> 
>>> Katim
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 4:35 PM, ICANN At-Large Staff 
>>> <staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear All,
>>> 
>>> The JAS Working Group Call with members of the Board, GAC and GNSO invited, 
>>> is scheduled on Tuesday, 14 June 2001, at 13:00 UTC. We hope you will be 
>>> able to join us.
>>> 
>>> PROPOSED AGENDA: 
>>> Introduction (5 to 10 minutes) Evan Leibovitch -  Highlights Second 
>>> Milestone Report covering short history how it was developed and specific 
>>> summary points
>>> Board/GAC questions/comments (30 to 40 minutes) – JAS WG would like to 
>>> listen to individual feedback and receive questions/suggestions from GAC 
>>> and Board members
>>> Singapore (5 to 10 minutes) Rafik Dammak/Carlton Samuels – Should there be 
>>> a public meeting with the JAS WG GAC/Board members during the Singapore 
>>> ICANN Meeting?
>>> As a reminder, it would help the JAS WG to better prepare if you could:
>>> Advise on the representatives from the Board and GAC that will be able to 
>>> attend the  teleconference.
>>> Send us any questions or comments on the Milestone Report in advance, if 
>>> possible.
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
>>> 
>>> ALAC Chair
>>> 
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Dial-in details: Tuesday 14 June 2011 at 13:00 UTC
>>> 
>>> For other places see:
>>> 
>>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=JAS+WG&iso=20110607T13
>>>  
>>> ADOBE CONNECT:
>>> http://icann.adobeconnect.com/jas/
>>> 
>>> Wiki Workspace:
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/SO-AC+New+gTLD+Applicant+Support+Working+Group+%28JAS-WG%29
>>> 
>>> If you require a dial-out, please email staff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with you 
>>> preferred contact number.
>>> ____________________________________________________________________________
>>> Participant passcode: JAS
>>> 
>>> For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call.       
>>>                                    
>>> ____________________________________________________________________________
>>> Dial in numbers:                               
>>> Country                             Toll Numbers          Freephone/Toll 
>>> Free Number
>>> 
>>> ARGENTINA                                                   0800-777-0519
>>> AUSTRALIA           ADELAIDE:      61-8-8121-4842           1-800-657-260
>>> AUSTRALIA           BRISBANE:      61-7-3102-0944           1-800-657-260
>>> AUSTRALIA           CANBERRA:      61-2-6100-1944           1-800-657-260
>>> AUSTRALIA           MELBOURNE:     61-3-9010-7713           1-800-657-260
>>> AUSTRALIA           PERTH:         61-8-9467-5223           1-800-657-260
>>> AUSTRALIA           SYDNEY:        61-2-8205-8129           1-800-657-260
>>> AUSTRIA                            43-1-92-81-113           0800-005-259
>>> BELGIUM                            32-2-400-9861            0800-3-8795
>>> BRAZIL                                                      0800-7610651
>>> CHILE                                                       1230-020-2863
>>> CHINA*                             86-400-810-4789          10800-712-1670
>>>                                                             10800-120-1670
>>> COLOMBIA                                                    01800-9-156474
>>> CZECH REPUBLIC                     420-2-25-98-56-64        800-700-177
>>> DENMARK                            45-7014-0284             8088-8324
>>> ESTONIA                                                     800-011-1093
>>> FINLAND             Land Line:     106-33-203               0-800-9-14610
>>> FINLAND             Mobile:        09-106-33-203            0-800-9-14610
>>> FRANCE              LYON:          33-4-26-69-12-85         080-511-1496
>>> FRANCE              MARSEILLE:     33-4-86-06-00-85         080-511-1496
>>> FRANCE              PARIS:         33-1-70-70-60-72         080-511-1496
>>> GERMANY                            49-69-2222-20362         0800-664-4247
>>> GREECE                             30-80-1-100-0687         00800-12-7312
>>> HONG KONG                          852-3001-3863            800-962-856
>>> HUNGARY                                                     06-800-12755
>>> INDIA                                                       000-800-852-1268
>>> INDONESIA                                                   001-803-011-3982
>>> IRELAND                            353-1-246-7646           1800-992-368
>>> ISRAEL                                                      1-80-9216162
>>> ITALY                              39-02-3600-6007          800-986-383
>>> JAPAN               OSAKA:         81-6-7739-4799           0066-33-132439
>>> JAPAN               TOKYO:         81-3-5539-5191           0066-33-132439
>>> LATVIA                                                      8000-3185
>>> LUXEMBOURG                         352-27-000-1364          
>>> MALAYSIA                                                    1-800-81-3065
>>> MEXICO                                                      001-866-376-9696
>>> NETHERLANDS                        31-20-718-8588           0800-023-4378
>>> NEW ZEALAND                        64-9-970-4771            0800-447-722
>>> NORWAY                             47-21-590-062            800-15157
>>> PANAMA                                                      
>>> 011-001-800-5072065
>>> PERU                                                        0800-53713
>>> PHILIPPINES                        63-2-858-3716            
>>> POLAND                                                      00-800-1212572
>>> PORTUGAL                                                    8008-14052
>>> RUSSIA                                                      
>>> 8-10-8002-0144011
>>> SINGAPORE                          65-6883-9230             800-120-4663
>>> SLOVAK REPUBLIC                    421-2-322-422-25         
>>> SOUTH AFRICA                                                080-09-80414
>>> SOUTH KOREA                        82-2-6744-1083           00798-14800-7352
>>> SPAIN                              34-91-414-25-33          800-300-053
>>> SWEDEN                             46-8-566-19-348          0200-884-622
>>> SWITZERLAND                        41-44-580-6398           0800-120-032
>>> TAIWAN                             886-2-2795-7379          00801-137-797
>>> THAILAND                                                    
>>> 001-800-1206-66056
>>> UNITED KINGDOM      BIRMINGHAM:    44-121-210-9025          0808-238-6029
>>> UNITED KINGDOM      GLASGOW:       44-141-202-3225          0808-238-6029
>>> UNITED KINGDOM      LEEDS:         44-113-301-2125          0808-238-6029
>>> UNITED KINGDOM      LONDON:        44-20-7108-6370          0808-238-6029
>>> UNITED KINGDOM      MANCHESTER:    44-161-601-1425          0808-238-6029
>>> URUGUAY                                                     000-413-598-3421
>>> USA                                1-517-345-9004           866-692-5726
>>> VENEZUELA                                                   0800-1-00-3702  
>>>                            
>>> 
>>> *Access to your conference call will be either of the numbers listed, 
>>> dependent on the participants' local telecom provider.                      
>>>      
>>> 
>>> Restrictions may exist when accessing freephone/toll free numbers using a 
>>> mobile telephone.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>