<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] New Measures Proposed to Enhance Post-Expiration and Renewal Related Policies and Practices
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] New Measures Proposed to Enhance Post-Expiration and Renewal Related Policies and Practices
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:56:44 -0700
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcwryKSPTZV0hD8yRk+TjlkTiA5TUQ==
- Thread-topic: New Measures Proposed to Enhance Post-Expiration and Renewal Related Policies and Practices
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-14jun11-en.htm
New Measures Proposed to Enhance Post-Expiration and Renewal Related Policies
and Practices
GNSO Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery Working Group Presents Final Report
14 June 2011
The GNSO Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery (PEDNR) Working Group has
submitted its Final
Report<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/pednr-final-report-14jun11-en.pdf> [PDF,
998 KB] to the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Council today, 14
June 2011. The PEDNR WG was tasked to address questions in relation to what
extent registrants should be able to renew their domain names after they
expire. Following review of the
comments<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/9405459/PEDNR+Public+comment+review+tool+-+Final+-+8+June+2011.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1307530348000>
received on its proposed Final Report, the Working Group now presents its
Final Report, which contains 18 recommendations including the following:
* Provide a minimum of 8 days after expiration for renewal by registrant
(Recommendation #2)
* An expired website must explicitly say that registration has expired and
instructions on how to recover the registration (Recommendation #3)
* The registration agreement must include information on the fees charged
for the post-expiration renewal of a domain name (Recommendation #5)
* Clear indication of methods used to deliver pre- and post-expiration
notifications must be provided (Recommendation #6)
* At least two notices prior to expiration need to be sent at set times and
one after expiration (Recommendation #7 & #8)
* Notifications must not solely be done by methods which require explicit
action by the Registrant (Recommendation #9)
* All gTLDs and registrars must offer Redemption Grace Period (RGP), with
the exception of sponsored gTLDs (Recommendation #13 & 14)
* The transfer of a domain name during the RGP should not be allowed (Rec#15)
* ICANN should develop educational materials on how to properly steward a
domain name and prevent unintended loss (Recommendation #16)
* Best practice recommendations: Post-expiration notifications should be
sent to some other contact point than to the email address associated with the
expired registration (Recommendation #10), provide notice of where notification
emails will be sent from (Recommendation #11), encourage registrants to provide
a secondary email point of contact (Recommendation #12)
Further details and background on each of these and the other recommendations
can be found in the PEDNR Final
Report<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/pednr-final-report-14jun11-en.pdf> [PDF,
998 KB]. The GNSO Council will now consider these recommendations for adoption.
Background
At the ICANN Meeting in Cairo in November 2008, the At-Large Advisory Committee
(ALAC), voted to request an Issues Report on the subject of registrants being
able to recover domain names after their formal expiration date. The ALAC
request was submitted to ICANN policy staff and the GNSO Council on 20 November
2008. The Issues Report on Post-Expiration Domain Name
Recovery<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/post-expiration-recovery/report-05dec08.pdf>
[PDF, 422 KB] was submitted to the GNSO Council on 5 December 2008. The GNSO
Council initiated a PDP<http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#200905> on 7 May
2009 and tasked a Working Group to answer the following charter questions:
* Whether adequate opportunity exists for registrants to redeem their
expired domain names;
* Whether expiration-related provisions in typical registration agreements
are clear and conspicuous enough;
* Whether adequate notice exists to alert registrants of upcoming
expirations;
* Whether additional measures need to be implemented to indicate that once a
domain name enters the Auto-Renew Grace Period, it has expired (e.g., hold
status, a notice on the site with a link to information on how to renew, or
other options to be determined);
* Whether to allow the transfer of a domain name during the RGP.
The Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery (PEDNR) PDP Working Group started its
deliberations in July 2009.
Further Information:
* PEDNR Final
Report<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/pednr-final-report-14jun11-en.pdf> [PDF,
998 KB]
* PEDNR Public Comment Review
Tool<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/9405459/PEDNR+Public+comment+review+tool+-+Final+-+8+June+2011.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1307530348000>
* PEDNR PDP Proposed Final
Report<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/pednr/pednr-proposed-final-report-21feb11-en.pdf>
[PDF, 972 KB]
* PEDNR PDP Initial
Report<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/pednr/pednr-initial-report-31may10-en.pdf>
[PDF, 1.02 MB]
* PEDNR WG workspace<https://st.icann.org/post-expiration-dn-recovery-wg/>
Staff responsible: Marika Konings
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|