<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Motion on Travel Funding
Ross Rader wrote:
On 10-Dec-07, at 1:07 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
I'd like to see an exception mechanism, either from the universal
funding position (nominally Adrian's) or the universal rejection
position (nominally yours), that has some means test for need.
In principle, I agree that something like this might necessarily be
included, but in practice it would be difficult to apply. All of the
Councillors come from established organizations and I fail to see why
domain name prices should be increased simply to ensure their
participation at ICANN meetings. If Councillors cannot afford to
travel, then I would question their capability to represent their
constituency - and also that of the Constituency to support their
Councillors.
We can't be discussing the IPC's set of seats (the IPC itself and the
failed BC and ISPC, which do nothing but represent marks interests), but
we could be discussing individuals from smaller registrars or registries
representing those constituencies, and we could be discussing
individuals elected to represent interests other than those three
commercial "stakeholders".
Where I don't want us to arrive is a process that cannot afford any
"disinterested persons" on the GNSO Council.
Where I also don't want us to arrive is a process that has "for
individuals of significant net worth" written on it, like the ads for
private banks in Switzerland.
I don't mind a portion of my constituency dues being earmarked for
this sort of thing, but there's something terribly wrong with ICANN
collecting a tax to ensure telecommunications lobbyists, professional
consultants and other paid advocates a free ride. The people that are
lobbying hardest for this type of funding have the strongest track
record of attendance at the ICANN meetings.
Rather than beat ICANN with the first stick at hand, could we work on
fixing ICANN? I read the fifth-of-a-million costing too, and that was
just for the BoD, not the rest of the traveling circus. I remember when
IETFs where held on college campus (whatever the plural is for that
word) and venue selection criteria has a real effect on cost, as does
the model of no fixed point of infrastructure (other than the MdR and
now-down-sized Bxl) floor spaces.
Ignore the prior note starting with "Intellectual Property
Constituency", my son Jonah managed to send that to reduce screen
clutter (it was in the way of his Disney window after all), before
bumping my antenna off-alignment and taking us off-line for a bit.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|