Re: [registrars] Motion on Travel Funding

[Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

BTW - in order for this to become the position of the constituency, it  
will require someone to second the proposal and a few endorsements  
(5?) as well.
Of course, I'm happy to take amendments that might improve the  
positioning.
On 7-Dec-07, at 9:51 PM, Ross Rader wrote:

> I would like to propose that the constituency adopt the following  
> motion as its position regarding travel funding for GNSO councillors;
> --
> Whereas the GNSO Council is composed of constituency representatives  
> from specific and significant groups of stakeholders, plus liaisons  
> and nominating committee appointees, and;
> Whereas, those groups of stakeholders are private sector  
> participants with a professional interest in the work of ICANN and  
> the GNSO, and;
> Whereas those participants include representatives from a broad  
> cross-section of well-funded corporations, professional  
> associations, lobby firms and other organizations,
> Therefore be it resolved
>
> a) That the GNSO Registrar Constituency does not believe it is  
> appropriate to fund the participation of GNSO Constituency  
> Councillors in any way, including to fund travel to any ICANN  
> meetings or events.
> b) That the Constituency adopt this as its formal position and  
> instructs its elected representatives to vigorously advocate this  
> position.
>
>
> Ross Rader
> Director, Retail Services
> t. 416.538.5492
> c. 416.828.8783
> http://www.domaindirect.com
>
> "To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
> - Erik Nupponen
Ross Rader
Director, Retail Services
t. 416.538.5492
c. 416.828.8783
http://www.domaindirect.com

"To solve the problems of today, we must focus on tomorrow."
- Erik Nupponen