<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] George was right. It's time to close down this list.
- To: "'Danny Younger'" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Ga'" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] George was right. It's time to close down this list.
- From: "Debbie Garside" <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:11:03 +0100
Well said Danny!
I asked a similar question some time ago when I first ventured into this
forum.
At that time, I seem to remember, I likened it to a forum for "hitting ICANN
with a big stick" because I couldn't see what the objectives were from the
posts.
Not much has changed over time.
Best regards
Debbie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Danny Younger
> Sent: 24 September 2009 18:35
> To: GA
> Subject: [ga] George was right. It's time to close down this list.
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> Over the last few years I have watched the steady decline of
> this list. It used to be a discussion list known for robust
> discussions that served a purpose.
>
> Allow me to remind you why this list was created:
>
> "The GA shall be an open forum for participation in the work
> of the DNSO, and open to all who are willing to contribute
> effort to the work of the DNSO. The participants in the GA
> should be individuals who have a knowledge of and an interest
> in issues pertaining to the areas for which the DNSO has
> primary responsibility, and who are willing to contribute
> time, effort and expertise to the work of the DNSO, including
> work item proposal and development, discussion of work items,
> draft document preparation, and participation in research and
> drafting committees and working groups."
>
> Now ask yourself: Where are the draft documents? Where is
> there any work item proposal or development? Where is there
> any research or drafting effort? Where is the added value
> that this list was designed to offer?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|