RE: [ga] Re: Proposal: Establishing a Registrant Advisory Committee

["Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>]

Jeff,

oh, come on..., don't be so downcast, it's just paralyzing... :-)
Frankly, I don't care too much about what's going on around me,
particularly, about what I can't directly influence but there is still a
lot of things we can do. The rest is not worth noticing let alone
fearing :-))) Anyway, the situation at ICANN all around is ripe for
change.

Yes, indeed, the new constituency and the committee will have to be
represented by public-oriented people and the ALAC members/participants
could be a good choice.

Dominik


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Jeffrey A. Williams
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 11:36 AM
To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; DOC/NTIA ICANN Rep
Cc: Avri Doria; At-Large Worldwide
Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Proposal: Establishing a Registrant Advisory
Committee


Dominik and all,

  Well IMO only, it would seem wise and reasonable that first there must
be a Independent Registrants Constituency lest this proposed committee
gets stacked with only existing Constituency members and the same old
musical chairs is propagated yet again, and as a result the opinions of
a tiny minority are represented as a consensus of the many whom are not,
and have never been represented.

  Another method to avoid the above concern, is to have ALAC global
members/participants whom are registrants holding at least 2/3's of this
new committee seats to ensure proper representation of same and at the
same time, or as you say in parallel, get the Independent Registrants
Constituency going and a new GNSO council elected with the proper
accurate representation for the first time in ICANN's history.

  My guess is however neither of these things are going to be allowed to
happen as it would upset the current apple cart of the current power
structure in both ICANN and the GNSO, leaving the IPC and the BC far
less influential than they are now.

  So Dominik, spread the word and thank you for standing up for change!

Dominik Filipp wrote:

> Jeff,
>
> you are right. I have changed my mind regarding the committee. I am 
> keen on supporting both the motions. The only question is which one to

> start with. Or with both in parallel? Danny has not expressed his 
> opinion on this yet.
>
> Dominik
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Jeffrey A. Williams
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 4:41 PM
> To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; DOC/NTIA ICANN Rep; Avri Doria
> Cc: Peter Dengate Thrush; twomey@xxxxxxxxx; At-Large Worldwide
> Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Proposal: Establishing a Registrant Advisory 
> Committee
>
> Dominik and all,
>
>   Our members sympathize with your concerns here Dominik.
> Yet I see no harm in the forming of such a committee as long as it is 
> not stacked with committee members that only reflect the current ICANN

> GNSO constituency's members.
>
> Dominik Filipp wrote:
>
> > Danny,
> >
> > I do not agree. Creating an Advisory Committee without voting power 
> > makes no sense to me at all. It would just be yet another toothless 
> > voice lost among many others incapable of influencing final
decisions.
> > Registrants/stakeholders must gain full support and respect within 
> > ICANN they truly deserve.
> >
> > Dominik
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> > Behalf Of Danny Younger
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:44 AM
> > To: Peter Dengate Thrush
> > Cc: twomey@xxxxxxxxx; ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; At-Large Worldwide
> > Subject: [ga] Re: Proposal: Establishing a Registrant Advisory 
> > Committee
> >
> > Peter,
> >
> > Thank you for your thoughtful reply.  I share your view of the 
> > importance of feeding timely advice into the policy-making and 
> > coordinating processes handled via the Supporting Organizations; 
> > this is precisely what Advisory Committees are supposed to do.
> >
> > I'm further appreciative of your assessment that an Advisory Body 
> > whose sole focus is upon the needs of the general registrant 
> > community
>
> > "may be a useful development", and I will be happy to work with 
> > those on the GA and NARALO lists that have already endorsed this 
> > concept to see it carefully distinguished per the guidelines that 
> > you have
> tendered.
> >
> > It is my expectation that a more formal proposal will be put forth 
> > in advance of the Paris session that will clarify for the board the 
> > extent of the interests that are not being properly served by the 
> > current structure.
> >
> > With regard to your query on the topic of registrar contracts, I 
> > look forward to the self-regulatory activities that will be pursued 
> > by the registrar community and believe that the guidance offered by 
> > such an AC will doubtless facilitate work in the SO community to 
> > buttress that
>
> > self-regulatory effort through the consensus policy process.
> >
> > Understanding that an Advisory Committee is, per the bylaws, a 
> > creation of the board, it would have been presumptive and 
> > inappropriate to act to self-form such a group, but I am willing to 
> > work with others to clarify the AC's likely future membership and 
> > its goals in much the same manner that the earlier At-Large 
> > Organizing Committee (ALOC) facilitated the emergence of the ALAC; 
> > additionally, per your request a clear cost benefit analysis will of

> > course be
> provided.
> >
> > As bottom-up momentum is already developing with regard to this 
> > proposal, it is my expectation that the clarity of purpose you seek 
> > will soon emerge in upcoming discussions.
> >
> > Thank you for sharing your views.  I look forward to further 
> > discussions as needed.
> >
> > best wishes,
> > Danny
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > __
> > __
> > ____________
> > Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page.
> > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
> Regards,
>
> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)

> "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
>    Abraham Lincoln
>
> "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is 
> very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
>
> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; 
> liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] 
> ===============================================================
> Updated 1/26/04
> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
> div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
> ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail 
> jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx My Phone: 214-244-4827

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx My Phone: 214-244-4827