RE: [ga] Agendas

["Roberto Gaetano" <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>]

My personal position is that the GA should be a mailing list that all people
participating to the GNSO processes, either as individuals, or as
representatives of an organization, can subscribe to. This is matter under
discussion in the GNSO Review WG, as many other options are possible.
The GNSO Review WG plans to have a draft document ready for discussion in
LA.
Roberto


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ross Rader
> Sent: 05 October 2007 18:37
> Cc: GA
> Subject: Re: [ga] Agendas
> 
> 
> Hugh Dierker wrote:
> 
> > I am willing to adapt in order to keep things progressing.
> 
> It would be a nice adaptation if you started referring 
> instead to the "GA-List" and the "mailing list subscribers". 
> The GA is not an institution and doesn't exist any more than 
> Harry Potter or Jeff Williams. Repeating it as some sort of 
> fact won't wish it into existence.
> 
> That said, I think there's a bright future for the mailing 
> list and its subscribers provided that the reasonable 
> subscribers start imposing their rationality on the discussion.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> 
> Ross Rader
> Director, Retail Services
> Tucows Inc.
> 
> http://www.domaindirect.com
> t. 416.538.5492