Re: GA "Election" was fake, ignore the "results" ( was Re: [ga] Elections Results - vote count)

[Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Debbie Garside wrote:

> There wouldn't be a k00k factor if one or two of "you" would actually take
> the time and trouble to participate. 
There are any number of subscribers to this list that will vouch that 
participation in the GA has always been hampered by a couple of nut bars 
that have had nothing better to do with their lives than try to turn 
this list, and the GA before it, into their own playground. My 
participation didn't change this in the past, and it won't change it 
going forward - that is unless there are others that believe there is 
still a need for a forum for cross-constituency and stakeholder dialogue.
But please don't mistake that interest as support for the silly agenda 
that a few have been pushing on this list lately.
-r