RE: GA "Election" was fake, ignore the "results" ( was Re: [ga] Elections Results - vote count)

["Debbie Garside" <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Ross

I am a little dense and know not of any silly agendas on this list.
However, if you feel that there are people on this list who are pursuing
some sort of hidden agenda the way to get around it is to participate and
steer the list in the right direction.  Come on!  We need sensible people.
The more sensible people that participate and the more people that support
the rules, the less likely the nut bars will continue.  The rules were
devised to deal with the nut bars.  Help us.  Unless, of course, I am deemed
a nut bar ;-)

Best regards

Debbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Rader [mailto:ross@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 04 October 2007 02:40
> To: debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: 'George Kirikos'; ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: GA "Election" was fake, ignore the "results" (
> was Re: [ga] Elections Results - vote count)
>
> Debbie Garside wrote:
>
> > There wouldn't be a k00k factor if one or two of "you"
> would actually
> > take the time and trouble to participate.
>
> There are any number of subscribers to this list that will
> vouch that participation in the GA has always been hampered
> by a couple of nut bars that have had nothing better to do
> with their lives than try to turn this list, and the GA
> before it, into their own playground. My participation didn't
> change this in the past, and it won't change it going forward
> - that is unless there are others that believe there is still
> a need for a forum for cross-constituency and stakeholder dialogue.
>
> But please don't mistake that interest as support for the
> silly agenda that a few have been pushing on this list lately.
>
> -r
>
>
>
>
>