<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS lookup service
- To: Registrar Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS lookup service
- From: Jean-Michel Becar <jmbecar@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:02:40 +0900
- In-reply-to: <5.2.1.1.2.20030916192843.06858c40@206.16.184.129>
- References: <34886814.1063748698@[192.168.1.155]> <5.2.1.1.2.20030916151536.0a81a8a0@206.16.184.129> <5.2.0.9.0.20030916225141.02c93410@207.228.254.7> <18407718.1063732218@[192.168.1.155]> <BCAAA5D64C837641A9EBB93E2A50894804F9BCBF@ex2k01.corp.register.com> <BCAAA5D64C837641A9EBB93E2A50894804F9BCBF@ex2k01.corp.register.c om> <5.2.1.1.2.20030916160946.051adc50@206.16.184.129> <34886814.1063748698@[192.168.1.155]> <5.2.1.1.2.20030916192843.06858c40@206.16.184.129>
- Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030718
Anyone talked to the ASO's folks?
This new way of operating the .com .net zones will also have a big
impact on the network operators and ISP as for example when you want to
troubleshoot a network problem people will always get answer for any
domain via a nslookup :-(
--
Jean-Michel Becar
Senior Architect
Global Media Online INC.
Tokyo - 150-8512
Tel: +81 (0)3 5456 2687
Robert F. Connelly wrote:
At 09:51 PM 9/16/03 -0400, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
I think a little polishing would not hurt. Ross, is that okay or do
you want it presented as is?
I'd prefer to move it forward as is. I'm a fan of the whereas etc.,
but I'd rather move this forward *now* than wait another day for
polishing...
Dear Ross: Done:-) Regards, BobC
We could end up tying this up in "procedure" for longer than we
actually have...let's just move forward as is...(and next time, I'll
polish before I move ;)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|