ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS lookup service

  • To: Jim Archer <jarcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Elana Broitman <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, ross@xxxxxxxxxx, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS lookup service
  • From: Paul Westley <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 22:52:34 +0100
  • Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <18407718.1063732218@[192.168.1.155]>
  • References: <BCAAA5D64C837641A9EBB93E2A50894804F9BCBF@ex2k01.corp.register.com> <BCAAA5D64C837641A9EBB93E2A50894804F9BCBF@ex2k01.corp.register.c om>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'll further endorse Ross's motion. Does this make 5 now?

Paul Westley
Internetters

At 05:10 PM 16/09/2003 -0400, Jim Archer wrote:

I had also seconded Ross' motion.
--On Tuesday, September 16, 2003 4:55 PM -0400 Elana Broitman <ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 


I note that Ross' motion received one "second."  Our rules of procedure
require 5 endorsements, so I will add myself to the endorsement list.

If Ross can get 3 more, it can go forward for a vote.  I also note,
however, that the relevant date for getting our position heard is the
GNSO Council's Sept. 25th telephone meeting.  There seems to be a great
deal of interest and concern among constituency members.  Therefore, if
there are no objections, I would recommend that we use boardrooms to vote
on an expedited basis, so that a vote could be concluded by the 24th.  Is
there any objection?

Regards,

Elana Broitman
Register.com
575 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018
Phone (212) 798-9215
Fax   (212) 629-9309
ebroitman@xxxxxxxxxxxx


-----Original Message-----
From: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 6:12 AM
To: Bruce Tonkin
Cc: registrars@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS
lookup service


On 9/16/2003 12:29 AM Bruce Tonkin noted that:


It would be useful to have a registrar constituency position on this
topic.


Here's a motion for discussion

"The Registrar Constituency strongly recommends that the GNSO Council
advocate that ICANN explicitly require gTLD Registry Operators to return
an NXDOMAIN response for DNS records that do not exist and that in all
cases, wild-card entries in gTLD zones should be strictly forbidden."
--

There are any number of reasons why this is desirable, I don't think I
need to rehash those.

--


                        -rwr
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>