ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS lookup service

  • To: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Registrar Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS lookup service
  • From: Jim Archer <jarcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:44:58 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <5.2.1.1.2.20030916160946.051adc50@206.16.184.129>
  • References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030916151536.0a81a8a0@206.16.184.129> <5.2.0.9.0.20030916225141.02c93410@207.228.254.7> <18407718.1063732218@[192.168.1.155]> <BCAAA5D64C837641A9EBB93E2A50894804F9BCBF@ex2k01.corp.register.com> <BCAAA5D64C837641A9EBB93E2A50894804F9BCBF@ex2k01.corp.register.c om> <5.2.1.1.2.20030916160946.051adc50@206.16.184.129>
  • Reply-to: Jim Archer <jarcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--On Tuesday, September 16, 2003 4:13 PM -0700 "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 


I wonder whether Ross would like to polish it further before that.  Once
I "publish the motion and call for discussion", the 14 day period for
discussion starts.
I think a little polishing would not hurt. Ross, is that okay or do you want it presented as is? 

Jim
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>