ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS lookup service

  • To: ross@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [registrars] Verisign change to operation of the .com DNS lookup service
  • From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 19:29:04 -0700
  • Cc: Jim Archer <jarcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Registrar Constituency <registrars@xxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <3F67BE07.5070605@tucows.com>
  • References: <34886814.1063748698@[192.168.1.155]> <5.2.1.1.2.20030916151536.0a81a8a0@206.16.184.129> <5.2.0.9.0.20030916225141.02c93410@207.228.254.7> <18407718.1063732218@[192.168.1.155]> <BCAAA5D64C837641A9EBB93E2A50894804F9BCBF@ex2k01.corp.register.com> <BCAAA5D64C837641A9EBB93E2A50894804F9BCBF@ex2k01.corp.register.c om> <5.2.1.1.2.20030916160946.051adc50@206.16.184.129> <34886814.1063748698@[192.168.1.155]>
  • Sender: owner-registrars@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

At 09:51 PM 9/16/03 -0400, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
I think a little polishing would not hurt. Ross, is that okay or do you want it presented as is?

I'd prefer to move it forward as is. I'm a fan of the whereas etc., but I'd rather move this forward *now* than wait another day for polishing...

Dear Ross:   Done:-)  Regards, BobC


We could end up tying this up in "procedure" for longer than we actually have...let's just move forward as is...(and next time, I'll polish before I move ;)





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>