ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] specific statements concerning the technical failure of ICANN

  • To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] specific statements concerning the technical failure of ICANN
  • From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:51:31 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=aj9fCMhT2bCyuH3dqUebS7NjRhgEiO9tWmzieu8gKOXLNyi+Gwy0Kzpv1V0izJOp; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
  • Reply-to: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Ted and all,

  Yes publically disclosing logs or leaving them unsecured
is a magnet for spamers, hackers, and terrorists whom which
to disrupt ecommerce, ect. on the Internet.  Publically
disclosing logs also aids and abets domain name tasters
to a very great degree.  

-----Original Message-----
>From: "Prophet Partners Inc." <Domains@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Aug 17, 2007 10:20 AM
>To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [ga] specific statements concerning the technical failure of ICANN
>
>Hi Joe,
>
>Please correct me if I'm wrong here, but wouldn't publicly disclosing the 
>root logs and traffic stats be akin to opening up Pandora's box? There are 
>currently huge problems associated with domain tasting. I could only imagine 
>that arming the domain tasters with such information would greatly magnify 
>domain.tasting problems.
>
>Sincerely,
>Ted
>Prophet Partners Inc.
>http://www.ProphetPartners.com
>http://www.Premium-Domain-Names.com
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Joe Baptista" <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <debbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: "'ga'" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <tlda-members@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "'`TLDA 
>Member List'" <members@xxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 9:59 PM
>Subject: Re: [ga] specific statements concerning the technical failure of 
>ICANN
>
>
><snipped>
>
>> I think there is very little competence here or anywhere else in ICANN
>> for policy making.  As clearly pointed out in my summary of the
>> technical disaster ICANN has made of the Internet shows there is little
>> to no understanding of the technical issues behind the root.  One thing
>> that should be pushed for is the making public of root logs or traffic
>> analysis.  I bet only a handful of people on the GA even know what those
>> statistics are?  Once the GA and other policy bodies of ICANN can look
>> at those root analysis - only then will the commons be properly informed
>> on the technical side of this disaster to make effective policy.  Until
>> then the song three blind mice is appropriate to almost all policy making.
>
><snipped> 
>
==========

Regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>