<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Consensus
- To: GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Consensus
- From: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 22:03:17 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=pjAQWOYBHS2tI/6Rgv1W9A4Nxmxim3jufSclFCFOawIWSTr+bEkULybZNpJBy/Ke; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Content-Type:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<HEAD>
<STYLE>body{font-family: Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:9pt;background-color: #ffffff;color: black;}</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3157" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=compText>
<P>Mr. Dierker and all,</P>
<P> </P>
<P> The IDNO was at first a very nobel consideration before it became besmirched</P>
<P>by personal misconduct. At that point it was and remains a failed experiment.</P>
<P>None of the IDNO principals of which some were voted upon are based on</P>
<P>any real consensus due to the misconduct by a few which is well documented.</P>
<P> </P>
<P> It now seems that with a failure of a ballot, non consideration on amendments</P>
<P>offered, and a lack of a quorum the GA members have been co-opted and</P>
<P>therefore victimized. This cannot and will not stand.<BR><BR><BR></P>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid">-----Original Message----- <BR>From: Hugh Dierker <HDIERKER2204@xxxxxxxxx><BR>Sent: Aug 17, 2007 12:05 AM <BR>To: GA <GA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Subject: [ga] Consensus <BR><BR>
<DIV>There appears some misunderstanding of my direction as far as consensus and the immediate path of the GA.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I do not think that every way out voice, that I cannot figure out, needs to be considered as we move toward consensus or voting. I try to make it very clear that I am not considering a point of view. It would appear normal that someone besides the voice in the wilderness would correct me if I were wrong. And so to date I feel confident we have moved with prudence.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>As far as the GA's future goes, it is my intention to move through the proper channels to get it as legitimate as possible. And at that point to move it to a point of true contribution to ICANN. It is my anticipation that this contribution will be with a slant to the protection of and furtherance of the rights of the User and the Registrant.</DIV>
<DIV>There is no good reason why the GA cannot be instrumental in the forming of constituencies. I myself have authored and published, based on old IDNO docs, the template for the IU charter and petition.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I will make two positive changes. 1. I will try to read posts by those I heretofore quit reading. (but someone is going to pay my therapist bill;-)</DIV>
<DIV>2. I will try to be more forthright in expressing my intentions.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Eric</DIV>
<DIV>As Chair</DIV>
<P></P>==========<BR><BR>Regards,<BR>Jeffrey A. Williams<BR>Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)<BR>"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -<BR> Abraham Lincoln<BR><BR>"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very<BR>often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt<BR><BR>"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability<BR>depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by<BR>P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."<BR>United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]<BR>===============================================================<BR>Updated 1/26/04<BR>CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of<BR>Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.<BR>ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<BR>Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827<BR></ZZZBODY></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|