Re: [ga] GA list and the GNSO council
Debbie Garside wrote: I agree completely. It would be unprofessional. There is no dispute there. What I have found however is that communication has evolved, or should I say people have evolved. Many University English departments have been vocal in the degredation of language in communications. I however see it as communication evolving.Hi Jeff Just like little the things, IMHO, as per above is one such change. And the language shortcuts used in SMS another. Up here we have alot of problems with kids who spell in SMS speake. It would not surprise me if in a generation our kids may have problems understanding us. Thats why I subscribe to the communication practice of incorrectess - or unprofessional. I feel one can be unprofessional provided one is understood. Of course unprofessional does not mean we have to be impolite - but even that has it's communication strengths. what a world. by the way thanks for all your great work with Hugh et al. joe
begin:vcard fn:Joe Baptista n:Baptista;Joe org:PublicRoot Consortium adr:;;963 Ford Street;Peterborough;Ontario;K9J 5V5 ;Canada email;internet:baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx title:PublicRoot Representative tel;fax:+1 (509) 479-0084 tel;cell:+1 (416) 912-6551 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.publicroot.org version:2.1 end:vcard
|