ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Proposal: New Cross-constituency mailing list

  • To: Josh Semper <josh.semper@xxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Proposal: New Cross-constituency mailing list
  • From: George Kirikos <gkirikos@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 10:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=DZoob8v23pU9VsqJOND1tbutdAnHsbLI4+uG6nkOSFKxNxWIioIZ2gDKUfcN3R6uaA80v18cz0xLoM6yuOIircluJ58CeQQdkPvsLcrlSCr+hhrBKl2CtVOHHFLQ/LBfPwUWu1wLueLQkoTpJ6k4pJ5VmI02vbEbfLiv3oBsXsQ=;
  • In-reply-to: <c0d313670707080902s22ef0587w6239638accb992e6@mail.gmail.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Josh,

--- Josh Semper <josh.semper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Can someone explain what percentage of subscribers to this list voted
> for
> this kind of representation? I imagine it is something like a
> fraction of a
> percentage, because most have given up trying to use this as any real
> forum
> for discussion, and instead dont bother to participate.
> 
> I could hold an election for the president of the country and could
> win from
> a vote taken from 15 friends, it does not make it any more real.

The fraction is roughly zero. See the posts at:

http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga/msg06401.html
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga/msg06405.html
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga/msg06406.html
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga/msg06546.html
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/ga/msg06590.html

I suggest they apply to become an At-Large structure:

http://alac.icann.org/applications/

under the acronym KOOKS - Kindred Overseers Obfuscating Knowledge
Society :) -  and take their act on the road.

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
http://www.kirikos.com/
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>