<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] working group to design a better RAA
- To: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] working group to design a better RAA
- From: Karl Auerbach <karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 10:28:42 -0700
- Cc: Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kidsearch <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Bashar Al-Abdulhadi <bashar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20070409122403.77335.qmail@web52212.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
- References: <20070409122403.77335.qmail@web52212.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070302)
While you are on the working group you might want to ask why the
registry/registrar system is necessary at all?
Certainly it is possible to have other systems.
Over the years so many arbitrary assumptions have been imposed upon the
DNS marketplace.
Why registry/registrar?
Why domain name rental in increments of one year to a maximum of ten
years. Why not for a few months, why not for a lifetime?
Why rental for a period of time rather than fees for specific services
(such as updating NS records)?
Etc.
--karl--
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|