ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] working group to design a better RAA

  • To: Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kidsearch <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [ga] working group to design a better RAA
  • From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 05:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
  • Cc: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, Bashar Al-Abdulhadi <bashar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=RVR9/19JM4gjWbylKmt1IfPjcyh0KsbsDsRWR2aL8mwvpO64cmBa1I9hIL+HseDCOCnBIMPYSqHsvRpzjBMcQIJdis6kHTg7QCcNtcFdGcszG/jDDcn1MIYpjT7rFHbj3Z1OzVjuyXTorhfcFiKe+I6jnAWiriP/S8n8F0gERQE= ;
  • In-reply-to: <5.0.2.1.2.20070407132840.042f96a8@mail.terabytz.co.nz>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Joop,

I will be happy to participate.  

Best wishes,
Danny


--- Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> At 01:12 a.m. 7/04/2007, kidsearch wrote:
> >Sign me up too
> 
> Thanks for joining, Chris.
> Bashar, George, Danny and any other articulate
> registrant, pIease consider 
> coming on board  as well.
> 
> Perhaps the ICANN GNSO secretariat could give us an
> archived mailing 
> list   registrants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Please?
> 
> 
> >----- Original Message ----- From: "Joop Teernstra"
> <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: "Hugh Dierker" <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>;
> "Bashar Al-Abdulhadi" 
> ><bashar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 8:42 PM
> >Subject: [ga] working group to design a better RAA
> >
> >
> >>At 04:19 a.m. 5/04/2007, Hugh Dierker wrote:
> >>>There is the RAA which is somewhat standardized
> by ICANN. It needs to be 
> >>>brought up to date with this century.
> >>>
> >>>Then there is the registrant agreement side of
> the Registrar. Transfers 
> >>>and drops are not very uniform and the policies
> in place do very little 
> >>>for the consumer, be them B2B, Business to
> Individual or just plain for fun.
> >>>
> >>>It seems to me that the resulting registrant
> agreements and inextricably 
> >>>entwined with the RAAs.
> >>>
> >>>Therefore I would suggest we put together a
> working group to make our 
> >>>input on the RAAs known and heard.
> >>>
> >>>If volunteers are not forthcoming I will beg and
> cajole and threaten 
> >>>people to head the wg. It is my understanding I
> have about 205 to chose from.
> >>
> >>I take this as a Motion from the Chair and I
> second it.
> >>
> >>Such a working group can do a great deal of good
> for registrants.
> >>
> >>Hopefully Sotiris will volunteer to chair it and a
> good number of typical 
> >>registrants here will join.
> >>
> >>The agenda of the WG should be the drafting, from
> the ground up, of a 
> >>registrant-focused agreement that registrars can
> elect to adopt in the 
> >>name of genuine competition.
> >>
> >>
> >>-joop-
> 
> 



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time 
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>