Re: [ga] working group to design a better RAA

[Bashar Al-Abdulhadi <bashar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sure Joop, consider me in the group and i'll help as much as possible.

Joop Teernstra wrote:

> At 01:12 a.m. 7/04/2007, kidsearch wrote:
> > Sign me up too
>
> Thanks for joining, Chris.
> Bashar, George, Danny and any other articulate registrant, pIease 
> consider coming on board  as well.
>
> Perhaps the ICANN GNSO secretariat could give us an archived mailing 
> list   registrants@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Please?
>
>
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joop Teernstra" 
> > <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Hugh Dierker" <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>; "Bashar Al-Abdulhadi" 
> > <bashar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 8:42 PM
> > Subject: [ga] working group to design a better RAA
> >
> >
> > > At 04:19 a.m. 5/04/2007, Hugh Dierker wrote:
> > > > There is the RAA which is somewhat standardized by ICANN. It needs 
> > > > to be brought up to date with this century.
> > > >
> > > > Then there is the registrant agreement side of the Registrar. 
> > > > Transfers and drops are not very uniform and the policies in place 
> > > > do very little for the consumer, be them B2B, Business to 
> > > > Individual or just plain for fun.
> > > >
> > > > It seems to me that the resulting registrant agreements and 
> > > > inextricably entwined with the RAAs.
> > > >
> > > > Therefore I would suggest we put together a working group to make 
> > > > our input on the RAAs known and heard.
> > > >
> > > > If volunteers are not forthcoming I will beg and cajole and 
> > > > threaten people to head the wg. It is my understanding I have about 
> > > > 205 to chose from.
> > >
> > > I take this as a Motion from the Chair and I second it.
> > >
> > > Such a working group can do a great deal of good for registrants.
> > >
> > > Hopefully Sotiris will volunteer to chair it and a good number of 
> > > typical registrants here will join.
> > >
> > > The agenda of the WG should be the drafting, from the ground up, of 
> > > a registrant-focused agreement that registrars can elect to adopt in 
> > > the name of genuine competition.
> > >
> > >
> > > -joop-

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature