ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] working group to design a better RAA

  • To: kidsearch <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, GA <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] working group to design a better RAA
  • From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 18:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=XTzmvGLaelIUYwXgUhEvmaJDTvukrIJd7vxOLZcJXRKzQvkpxPk4oAtHzqCoabQYyGtmgP0NioM82DcWlRICjTyVbenZDsrR6dpy9XZk+XF3XPeuHn/5aylSb+NZwcl4oGCcc/Cfnb06jJ+QW/PMwcpbffbWPnwJKy0GXbwCnw0= ;
  • In-reply-to: <003b01c7784d$4453b560$1701a8c0@WebBusiness>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I take this as some concrete interest. 
  We need a chairperson for the WG.
  Sotiris has been mentioned and I will also mention Danny.
   
  It would be most appreciated if more will step forward to participate and Sotiris and Danny would respond. The forum for the group will be right here and all inclusive, using threads to delineate subjects and topics. Everyone can participate, but an actual group should be established of those with extreme interest and for agreeing on consensus positions.
  I would hope that minority viewpoints will be respected and reflected.
   
  I will take it upon myself to force someone to run this WG using my beauty and charm to coerce. However in that I am limited in such an arena I beg for someone to step forward.
   
  Eric

kidsearch <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  Sign me up too

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joop Teernstra" 
To: "Hugh Dierker" 
Cc: "Danny Younger" ; "Bashar Al-Abdulhadi" 
; 
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 8:42 PM
Subject: [ga] working group to design a better RAA


> At 04:19 a.m. 5/04/2007, Hugh Dierker wrote:
>>There is the RAA which is somewhat standardized by ICANN. It needs to be 
>>brought up to date with this century.
>>
>>Then there is the registrant agreement side of the Registrar. Transfers 
>>and drops are not very uniform and the policies in place do very little 
>>for the consumer, be them B2B, Business to Individual or just plain for 
>>fun.
>>
>>It seems to me that the resulting registrant agreements and inextricably 
>>entwined with the RAAs.
>>
>>Therefor I would suggest we put together a working group to make our input 
>>on the RAAs known and heard.
>>
>>If volunteers are not forthcoming I will beg and cajole and threaten 
>>people to head the wg. It is my understanding I have about 205 to chose 
>>from.
>>
>
> I take this as a Motion from the Chair and I second it.
>
> Such a working group can do a great deal of good for registrants.
>
> Hopefully Sotiris will volunteer to chair it and a good number of typical 
> registrants here will join.
>
> The agenda of the WG should be the drafting, from the ground up, of an 
> registrant-focused agreement that registrars can elect to adopt in the 
> name of genuine competition.
>
>
> -joop-
>
> 



 
---------------------------------
Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels 
in 45,000 destinations on Yahoo! Travel to find your fit.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>