<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] ICM cross-registry WHOIS database
- To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [ga] ICM cross-registry WHOIS database
- From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:18:47 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=FKaKfOh6DZX3w7D5d791P8q7vWqkw711/UiB5guBm8SNrrIAfOwTHSCWN356R01YIO4bzm+xCaWDvJJCsThSk9+enVeGKZEMgqcEnP6p+qi1B1jLzUO4tj3qIuvWCChbLV2P73ca1w6S4A1qGjMX4MkOJCeTJh92C+scV9ZDfXM=;
- In-reply-to: <345731.17055.qm@web52909.mail.yahoo.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Eric,
My suspicion is that members of the IPC had a private
deal-making session with the ICM Registry. This is
most likely why we are now seeing clauses pertaining
to both a searchable WHOIS system and to DMCA-style
take-down provisions.
Rather than debating these issues in a forthright
manner with their peers in the GNSO stakeholder
communities, I suspect that IPC members have chosen a
path to back-door these initiatives in the hope of
establishing a precedent that can be carried forward.
It's sad that in the desperate quest to obtain a TLD,
Stuart Lawley's ICM Registry has found it necessary to
cave in to the forces of trademark-uber-alles.
--- Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Danny,
>
> It seems that regardless of who runs it, it is
> just another chink in the armor of privacy.
>
> Eric
>
> Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jon,
>
> What's your view of the following clause in ICM's
> Appendix S?
>
> "Registrars will be required to participate in the
> operation of a cross-registry WHOIS database, which
> will provide searching capabilities and access to
> all
> information concerning domain name registrations
> regardless of which TLD the domain name is
> registered in or which registrar processed the
> domain
> name application."
>
> Who is providing this cross-registry database? Is
> this an ICANN project or an ICM initiative?
> Presumably this is something different than
> VeriSign's
> Centralized WHOIS.
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> The fish are biting.
> Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search
> Marketing.
>
http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Need Mail bonding?
> Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo!
> Answers users.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|