<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Vote
- To: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] Vote
- From: "Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 08:30:21 +0100
- Cc: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcdJu6wDSOkOblVlSMacDenfZMfU2gAA3VMg
- Thread-topic: [ga] Vote
Ehmm..., I wouldn't say the rules are nearly irrelevant. What if the GA
forum contains 100 members and just 10 of them participate on votings?
And an issue is approved by 6 (the majority of 10 voters)? Can then we
say the approved issue represents the GA opinion?
Dominik
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Williams [mailto:jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 9:55 PM
To: Dominik Filipp
Cc: kidsearch; ga
Subject: Re: [ga] Vote
>> Dominik and all,
>> CO-Chair, NOT Vice Chair...
>> Both Chair and CO-Chair to be equally serving as representative
>> of GA members and subservient to the will of the GA members via
>> resolution(s) passed simple majority vote or the GA members.
>> A moderator is not needed as we are all adults...
>> Voting rules are nearly irrelevant. One man/woman/GA member one
>> vote is the only rule really needed. It may be useful to have a time
>>limit for any and all votes.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|