<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Vote
- To: Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>, Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ga] Vote
- From: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 06:45:58 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: kidsearch <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ga <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=o7FhdC30tSsTpBP7WOao5ABOEoPMe3iIZpmBV2NbqMe+WuRK+tTqFzUASEUIQFQS+dVRdr4ocXIAM9gZ2Qz6iyXD0UWiFoP+pRU9Qd5O1ChnU1wJ8w5843TKT5OLr9cmOPAg02YGUHClwjKgsTxG2MuOjSWGvvoyl9NUqQeMfRg=;
- In-reply-to: <CA68B5E734151B4299391DDA5D0AF9BF107B87@mx1.dsoft.sk>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It seems to me to be yes. This is a general assembly.
Eric
Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ehmm..., I wouldn't say the rules are nearly irrelevant. What if the GA
forum contains 100 members and just 10 of them participate on votings?
And an issue is approved by 6 (the majority of 10 voters)? Can then we
say the approved issue represents the GA opinion?
Dominik
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Williams [mailto:jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 9:55 PM
To: Dominik Filipp
Cc: kidsearch; ga
Subject: Re: [ga] Vote
>> Dominik and all,
>> CO-Chair, NOT Vice Chair...
>> Both Chair and CO-Chair to be equally serving as representative
>> of GA members and subservient to the will of the GA members via
>> resolution(s) passed simple majority vote or the GA members.
>> A moderator is not needed as we are all adults...
>> Voting rules are nearly irrelevant. One man/woman/GA member one
>> vote is the only rule really needed. It may be useful to have a time
>>limit for any and all votes.
---------------------------------
Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|