RE: [ga] Vote on representation first

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

Why do you refer to the concept in such a deleting way? GA stands for General Assembly.
  As an assembly that has been here since the beginning of ICANN it need not be diluted by "voting society".
   
  Eric

Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
  I don't know, Jeff. My order of precedence is clearly stated, though not
detailed yet.

Recently I've also realized we could have something like a GA charter
describing the main principles the new GA voting society would abide by
(such as respecting voting results and their official presentation via
the chair/co-chair, etc.). The charter could then be published on the
booth site.

Dominik


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Williams [mailto:jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 8:55 AM
To: Dominik Filipp
Cc: Joop Teernstra; Hugh Dierker; ga
Subject: Re: [ga] Vote on representation first

Dominik and all,

Well now, how long are we or you, Joop, and Dr. Dierker going to
debate and/or argue which should be done first?

Dominik Filipp wrote:

> I would prefer having a chair and a co-chair too, and wouldn't go into

> the personal nomination election for now either.
>
> As for the competence of the future GA chair & co-chair 
> representatives, the voting results over issues should be mandatory 
> for the representatives and as such delegated to the outside world. 
> The representatives, thanks to the natural credibility given by the 
> voting public they represent, could therefore gain more respect from 
> the ICANN representatives.
>
> I, personally, would start with clarifying the chair (co-chair) 
> responsibilities and the subsequent voting on this. In the meantime, 
> we could start considering the personal nominations.
>
> By the way, Joop, I like the overall web site look'n'feel, nicely 
> done...
>
> Dominik



 
---------------------------------
Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited.