ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] Vote on representation first

  • To: "Hugh Dierker" <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [ga] Vote on representation first
  • From: "Dominik Filipp" <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:30:45 +0100
  • Cc: "ga" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcdDuD2ijv6fF1iRR0y2X5wjqG+E1AAAEB7w
  • Thread-topic: [ga] Vote on representation first

Yes, of course, the Generall Assembly but with the voting membership in
terms of our newly proposed voting system. In fact, I don't refer to it
in a 'deleting' but rather in a 'promoting' way.

Dominik

________________________________

From: Hugh Dierker [mailto:hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 4:15 PM
To: Dominik Filipp; Jeff Williams
Cc: ga
Subject: RE: [ga] Vote on representation first


Why do you refer to the concept in such a deleting way? GA stands for
General Assembly.
As an assembly that has been here since the beginning of ICANN it need
not be diluted by "voting society".
 
Eric

Dominik Filipp <dominik.filipp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

	I don't know, Jeff. My order of precedence is clearly stated,
though not
	detailed yet.
	
	Recently I've also realized we could have something like a GA
charter
	describing the main principles the new GA voting society would
abide by
	(such as respecting voting results and their official
presentation via
	the chair/co-chair, etc.). The charter could then be published
on the
	booth site.
	
	Dominik
	
	
	-----Original Message-----
	From: Jeff Williams [mailto:jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
	Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 8:55 AM
	To: Dominik Filipp
	Cc: Joop Teernstra; Hugh Dierker; ga
	Subject: Re: [ga] Vote on representation first
	
	Dominik and all,
	
	Well now, how long are we or you, Joop, and Dr. Dierker going to
	debate and/or argue which should be done first?
	
	Dominik Filipp wrote:
	
	> I would prefer having a chair and a co-chair too, and wouldn't
go into
	
	> the personal nomination election for now either.
	>
	> As for the competence of the future GA chair & co-chair 
	> representatives, the voting results over issues should be
mandatory 
	> for the representatives and as such delegated to the outside
world. 
	> The representatives, thanks to the natural credibility given
by the 
	> voting public they represent, could therefore gain more
respect from 
	> the ICANN representatives.
	>
	> I, personally, would start with clarifying the chair
(co-chair) 
	> responsibilities and the subsequent voting on this. In the
meantime, 
	> we could start considering the personal nominations.
	>
	> By the way, Joop, I like the overall web site look'n'feel,
nicely 
	> done...
	>
	> Dominik
	
	


________________________________

Access over 1 million songs - Yahoo! Music Unlimited.
<http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=36035/*http://music.yah
oo.com/unlimited/> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>