ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[ga] Time to bring back the vote

  • To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: [ga] Time to bring back the vote
  • From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 06:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=LGMV9nI4IdYaPQAcoGHzjPG5SmCG4zQNgmMja3LGXWxeZXf5FNIM0M7W1BXoBEl50g93J+vssC5YdYs2ioQk7NLJxECgHpdChehjCp1ID5K0drdMpGXzKo1fcZFmvuWCLcGSZalYrR2gOarB7S59KoTtFag8sMlj/66aH56jLcU= ;
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Kieren McCarthy contrasts the completely open and
transparent elections at Nominet with the
ultra-secretive process used to select ICANN Board
members.

See
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/18/nominet_icann_boards/

Any large international firm can hold a worldwide
shareholder's vote and elect directors to a board.  So
why is ICANN unwilling to let it's pool of registrants
elect their own directors?  Why must we put up with
this hidden-from-view back-room approach?

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>