<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Time to bring back the vote
- To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ga] Time to bring back the vote
- From: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:04:37 -0400
- References: <20060918135900.48482.qmail@web52215.mail.yahoo.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It was feasible from the very beginning but instead we had board squatters.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 9:59 AM
Subject: [ga] Time to bring back the vote
> Kieren McCarthy contrasts the completely open and
> transparent elections at Nominet with the
> ultra-secretive process used to select ICANN Board
> members.
>
> See
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/18/nominet_icann_boards/
>
> Any large international firm can hold a worldwide
> shareholder's vote and elect directors to a board. So
> why is ICANN unwilling to let it's pool of registrants
> elect their own directors? Why must we put up with
> this hidden-from-view back-room approach?
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.4/449 - Release Date: 9/15/06
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|