ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Time to bring back the vote

  • To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Time to bring back the vote
  • From: "kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 12:04:37 -0400
  • References: <20060918135900.48482.qmail@web52215.mail.yahoo.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

It was feasible from the very beginning but instead we had board squatters.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 9:59 AM
Subject: [ga] Time to bring back the vote


> Kieren McCarthy contrasts the completely open and
> transparent elections at Nominet with the
> ultra-secretive process used to select ICANN Board
> members.
> 
> See
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/18/nominet_icann_boards/
> 
> Any large international firm can hold a worldwide
> shareholder's vote and elect directors to a board.  So
> why is ICANN unwilling to let it's pool of registrants
> elect their own directors?  Why must we put up with
> this hidden-from-view back-room approach?
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.4/449 - Release Date: 9/15/06
> 
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>