Re: [ga] FW: Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed .biz contract

["kidsearch" <kidsearch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Then what do you think of creating working groups on particular issues. And
what issues do you think are the most important to address?

Here are a few I deem important.

1. Creation of a true nonprofit TLD strictly for nonprofit orgs with
regulations as such.
2. Creation of sTLDs that will reduse the number of trademark infringements
and arbitrations.
3. Creation of commercially viable tlds vs the dot aero and dot museum type.
4. How many new TLDs should be approved and why.
5. Monetized domain names and now even entire TLDs and how to stop domain
tasting.
6. Price restrictions and other registrar/registry contract issues.

Thats my top 6. I'm sure others could add to that list with no problem.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Veni Markovski" <veni@xxxxxxxx>
To: <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: [ga] FW: Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed .biz
contract


> At 01:20 PM 07.8.2006 '?.'  -0400, kidsearch wrote:
> >It is only the semantics that I worry about Veni. Sometimes you cloud the
> >question, sort of answering a question with a question, or shifting
> >responsibility away so you don't need to answer.
> >
> >Not attacking you Veni. As I said, at least you are here. Whether we
agree
> >on issues or not, its nice that at least one board member is here to take
> >the heat.
>
> As I wrote a minute ago - I don't mind you, or anyone on this list
> "attacking" me. I don't accept this as an attack. Karl was right in
> some of his points, but I believe they were written on the ground of
> misunderstanding me, and my actions as director. You see, the fact
> that I do not say in this list what I think or what I do on some
> issues, related to ICANN, does not mean I don't say it or I don't
> think it in other lists, or on my blog.
>
> I'd be eager to see some substential contribution, discussing the
> real issues confronting ICANN, and more generally - the Internet
> community - before the end of the year. We have the IANA, the MoU,
> the IGF, the ITU meeting - to name just four that matter to ICANN.
>
> veni
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.7/410 - Release Date: 8/5/06
>
>