Re: [ga] FW: Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed .biz contract

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Veni and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/uisers,

  Your response below is inaccurate, did not address the fact you did
not actually answer Danny's questions, and is also besides my point
as to Danny not looking for "Guidance".  So again Veni, your
obviscating.
As such you have again demonstrated you are behaving very
unprofessionally
as a BoD member of ICANN and therefore should resign or be removed
as a BoD member of ICANN.



Veni Markovski wrote:

>    At 01:37 AM 04.8.2006 '?.'  -0700, Jeff Williams wrote:
> >   Danny was not asking for "Guidance".
>
> When people start to forget, it's always good to remind them, and
> luckily there are records of who said what in the mailing list. See
> below.
> So, to summarize:
> Danny asked me a question, to which I responded.
> I've asked Danny a question on why he is misusing private e-mails in
> a public mailing list, to which he still hasn't responded "Please
> stay focused on the real problem (which is of much greater import
> than your views on my netiquette)".,  thus we have two facts: a) I've
> responded to his e-mail, and b) he hasn't said a word about his
> behaviour.
>
> veni
>
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 21:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [ga] FW: Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed
> .biz  contract
> To: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, Veni Markovski
> <veni@xxxxxxxx>,
>          "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Veni,
> []
> I have asked an ICANN Board member (yourself), in good
> faith, for guidance on how to best deal with a serious
> matter that now concerns four different registry
> operators.  I look forward to your constructive
> remarks.
>
> to which I've responded:
>
> Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 05:06:55 -0400
> To: Danny Younger <dannyyounger@xxxxxxxxx>, Veni Markovski
> <veni@xxxxxxxx>,
>          "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: Veni Markovski <veni@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [ga] FW: Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed
> .biz
>     contract
>
> Danny,
> 1. The proper channel to ask ICANN questions about its activities, is
> through the Chair of the Board, or the President.
> 2. Asking individual directors for their "guidance" is not the right
> way to deal with an organization.
> 3. Your desire to look for guidance from individual directors is
> understandabel, as the history of ICANN is full with strong
> individuals, who may have been giving guidance to you before.
> 4. It's better for the broader Internet community to have a strong
> ICANN, than just strong individuals with desire to give guidance when
> asked.
> 5. As for your questions, see the minutes of our January meeting. And
> note - I do not make comments, or give the "guidance" you requested.
> Neither you should expect me to comment on this - if you need the
> comments, read point # 1 above.
>
> attached quote:
> http://www.icann.org/minutes/minutes-10jan06.htm
>
>
>
>
>

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obediance of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827