Re: [ga] FW: Fee for disproportionate deletes in proposed .biz contract

[Veni Markovski <veni@xxxxxxxx>]

At 01:20 PM 07.8.2006 '?.'  -0400, kidsearch wrote:
> It is only the semantics that I worry about Veni. Sometimes you cloud the
> question, sort of answering a question with a question, or shifting
> responsibility away so you don't need to answer.
>
> Not attacking you Veni. As I said, at least you are here. Whether we agree
> on issues or not, its nice that at least one board member is here to take
> the heat.

As I wrote a minute ago - I don't mind you, or anyone on this list 
"attacking" me. I don't accept this as an attack. Karl was right in 
some of his points, but I believe they were written on the ground of 
misunderstanding me, and my actions as director. You see, the fact 
that I do not say in this list what I think or what I do on some 
issues, related to ICANN, does not mean I don't say it or I don't 
think it in other lists, or on my blog.

I'd be eager to see some substential contribution, discussing the 
real issues confronting ICANN, and more generally - the Internet 
community - before the end of the year. We have the IANA, the MoU, 
the IGF, the ITU meeting - to name just four that matter to ICANN.

veni