<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] Re: Please confirm your message
- To: John Palmer <jp@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [ga] Re: Please confirm your message
- From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 20:33:25 -0700
- Cc: General Assembly of the DNSO <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <20040514114122.35675.qmail@web40004.mail.yahoo.com> <40A56EF8.484EE7B0@ix.netcom.com> <1084577466.25260.TMDA@KOVU.ADNS.NET>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
John and all former DNSO GA members or other interested stakeholders/users,
As this (see below) message originated on a public mailing list forum
I DO confirm it. And I await your service, John! >:)
As you have made these threats before I have no fear of them...
Take your best shot!
John Palmer wrote:
> Your e-mail message with the subject of "Re: [ga] unsubscribe ga"
> is being held because your address was not recognized.
>
> PLEASE NOTE: THIS FILTER IS IN PLACE BECAUSE THIS USER DOES
> NOT WANT TO RECEIVE UNSOLICITED E-MAIL.
>
> IF YOU CONFIRM THIS MESSAGE AND THE MAIL TURNS OUT TO BE
> UNSOLICITED E_MAIL, YOU AGREE TO PAY THIS RECIPIENT $1,000
> US DOLLARS FOR EACH MESSAGE SENT BY YOU TO THIS RECIPIENT.
>
> WE WILL SUE YOU IF YOU DO NOT PAY.
>
> SPAMMERS ARE SLIMEBAG BOTTOM-FEEDING SCUM. WE WILL HUNT YOU
> DOWN LIKE THE ANIMALS YOU ARE AND EXTERMINATE YOU.
>
> If you are not sending unsolicited e-mail, please accept our
> apology for this inconvienience and do the following:
>
> To release your message for delivery, please send an empty message
> to the following address, or use your mailer's "Reply" feature.
>
> jp-confirm-1084577466.25260.70d35e@xxxxxxxx
>
> This confirmation verifies that your message is legitimate and not
> junk-mail.
>
> [ This notice was generated by TMDA/0.62 (http://tmda.net/),
> an automated junk-mail reduction system. ]
>
> --- Enclosed is a copy of your message.
>
> >From jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Fri May 14 19:31:06 2004
> Return-path: <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Received: from maynard.mail.mindspring.net ([207.69.200.243])
> by MAIL.ADNS.NET with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
> id 1BOm8v-0006ZM-R3
> for jp@xxxxxxxx; Fri, 14 May 2004 19:31:05 -0400
> Received: from 1cust241.tnt36.dfw9.da.uu.net ([67.234.81.241] helo=ix.netcom.com)
> by maynard.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
> id 1BOm2F-0003ZW-00; Fri, 14 May 2004 19:24:12 -0400
> Message-ID: <40A56EF8.484EE7B0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 18:14:34 -0700
> From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (Win95; U; 16bit)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> To: Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: John Palmer <jp@xxxxxxxx>, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ga] unsubscribe ga
> References: <20040514114122.35675.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Eric, John and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
> stakeholders/users,
>
> I am sorry to read of John's irritation which to me seems terribly
> unjustified. However he is entitled to his opinion, such as it is...
>
> Some stakeholders/users are silent because they have little of
> nothing to constructively offer. Others are silent because of fear
> of repercussions. Yet still others are silent because of personnel
> or business related reasons... It is true that in some instances,
> silence is golden. I hearken to the old title, "Silence of the lambs"
> as a significant reason why some wish others to be silent.. Perhaps
> John is part of this illustrious group, judging from he comment
> below...
>
> Criticizing without contribution is folly and a waste of time as well
> as effort for the most part. I am sorry John choose this approach..
>
> Hugh Dierker wrote:
>
> > This is a Quasi governmental forum. That is how we do things here in
> > the free world.
> > We allow free enterprise to come in and captivate. But if you sit on
> > your butt and fail to contribute or object you are as bad as the man
> > cutting off a head. Do you realize that silence creates more injury
> > than action?
> > Mr. Palmer you only seem too criticize but not contribute, but that is
> > ok.
> > e
> > John Palmer <jp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Yes - and well he should - the only posts have been joe jobs and your
> > off-topic nonsense.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Hugh Dierker
> > To: Dora Gerber
> > Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 10:24 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ga] unsubscribe ga
> >
> >
> > And well you should. People that know what is going on and sit and
> > watch without input are cowardly. The only bad things that happen are
> > a result of folks like you that do nothing in the face of problems.
> > Sleep well and good dreams.
> > e
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
> "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
> Pierre Abelard
>
> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> ===============================================================
> Updated 1/26/04
> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
> IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Registered Email addr with the USPS
> Contact Number: 214-244-4827
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
Pierre Abelard
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|