ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] unsubscribe ga


The fact of the matter is that this list lost its value when ICANN
adopted the so-called 'blueprint' or, to state it more appropriately
I think, the 'divide and conquer doctrine.'

The cohesiveness and participation is long destroyed in favor of the
Dyson promoted ALAC, or whatever the exact acronym it may be these days.
So, folks tried to start splinter groups, which are more easily
controlled by the King, ICANN.  It's not difficult to understand or to
realize the result.

However, this list still has some value. For instance, I read about
Eric, Hugh, Dr or whatever label he chooses to use, saving the
proverbial Damsel in distress with his superlative Karate kick and
then standing on the adversary's throat while negotiating options with
the adversary's colleagues. Then, of course, I also read the posts
from the spokesman of the 3-kalllion member strong group and from none
other than the horse, itself.  What's a day without sunshine?

Comic relief? - sometimes and more times than not. Constructive and on
topic - almost never.

John was much more realistic and accurate. Although, he was much less
patient than I. However, in John's case, too, 'each to his own . . .'

The sword cuts both ways.  You just can't choose the cut when it suits
you - unless you are earnest in the attainment of hypocrisy.
Although, I'd respect your choice, none the less.

Thanks,



Friday, May 14, 2004, 8:14:34 PM, Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JW> Eric, John and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
JW> stakeholders/users,

JW>   I am sorry to read of John's irritation which to me seems terribly
JW> unjustified.  However he is entitled to his opinion, such as it is...

JW>   Some stakeholders/users are silent because they have little of
JW> nothing to constructively offer.  Others are silent because of fear
JW> of repercussions.  Yet still others are silent because of personnel
JW> or business related reasons...  It is true that in some instances,
JW> silence is golden.  I hearken to the old title, "Silence of the lambs"
JW> as a significant reason why some wish others to be silent..  Perhaps
JW> John is part of this illustrious group, judging from he comment
JW> below...

JW>   Criticizing without contribution is folly and a waste of time as well
JW> as effort for the most part.  I am sorry John choose this approach..

JW> Hugh Dierker wrote:

>>   This is a Quasi governmental forum. That is how we do things here in
>> the free world.
>> We allow free enterprise to come in and captivate. But if you sit on
>> your butt and fail to contribute or object you are as bad as the man
>> cutting off a head. Do you realize that silence creates more injury
>> than action?
>> Mr. Palmer you only seem too criticize but not contribute, but that is
>> ok.
>> e
>> John Palmer <jp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Yes - and well he should - the only posts have been joe jobs and your
>> off-topic nonsense.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Hugh Dierker
>> To: Dora Gerber
>> Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 10:24 PM
>> Subject: Re: [ga] unsubscribe ga
>>
>>
>> And well you should. People that know what is going on and sit and
>> watch without input are cowardly.  The only bad things that happen are
>> a result of folks like you that do nothing in the face of problems.
>> Sleep well and good dreams.
>> e
>>
>>
>>
>>

JW> Regards,

JW> --
JW> Jeffrey A. Williams
JW> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
JW> "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" -
JW>     Pierre Abelard

JW> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
JW> liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
JW> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
JW> United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
JW> ===============================================================
JW> Updated 1/26/04
JW> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
JW> IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
JW> E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
JW>  Registered Email addr with the USPS
JW> Contact Number: 214-244-4827





----
Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA     Internet Concepts, Inc.
donbrown_l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx       http://www.inetconcepts.net
(972) 788-2364                    Fax: (972) 788-5049
----




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>