ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: 'stakeholders' was: Re: [ga] Re: ICANN before the US Senate...

  • To: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: 'stakeholders' was: Re: [ga] Re: ICANN before the US Senate...
  • From: Eric Dierker <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 01:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
  • Cc: eric@xxxxxxxxxx, jandl@xxxxxxxxx, karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • In-reply-to: <3F387522.15C38ECD@ix.netcom.com>
  • References: <3F387522.15C38ECD@ix.netcom.com>
  • Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Some think that only money talks. Not true.  Our global community is far
beyond that concept now. We are learning to care.
A Vietnamese or a mandarin does not say please and an American Piute or a
Mongolian say only thankyou with gestures or grunts.
Northern Hispanics love to say por favor and gracias as my Arizonans live on
thank you and "please Mam" and "howdy".  With the upright English it is a
broad tip of hat and with India a rolling of a hand.
Useage of language is everyones' right. Written, spoken or internet we are
learning that victors right not just more rich.
e


>   No Eric, it is obvious that users, Domain Name holders,
>stock holders in Internet industry companies, and governments
> are the stakeholders that ICANN and each other recognize
> as actual stakeholders, meaning individuals or entities of
> various types.  Shoe shine boys don't qualify Eric.  But
> they can!  To do so means that they must belly up to
> the bar so to speak.
> 
> Eric Dierker wrote:
> 
>> linguistics and philosophists tend to argue this point,
>> it is a grouping that makes a difference. And that is cool.
>> A stakeholder is far different in Tibet, Iraq, Hopi and NY.
>> Therefor our language base must be cognizant of differing concepts. In
>> other words all people are stakeholders in our internet.
>> Eric
>>





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>