<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: 'stakeholders' was: Re: [ga] Re: ICANN before the US Senate...
- To: jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: 'stakeholders' was: Re: [ga] Re: ICANN before the US Senate...
- From: Eric Dierker <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 00:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: eric@xxxxxxxxxx, bortzmeyer@xxxxxx, karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ga@xxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <3F38775B.34BB5406@ix.netcom.com>
- References: <3F38775B.34BB5406@ix.netcom.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A commoner is a person without gentry - in this case one without a website
or even domain name hence the term dotcommoner. I coined the phrase it is
amazing
gentry as yourself would correct me. Thankyou for allowing me the
opportunity to re-explain to the newcommoners.
e
> Eric and all former DNSO GA members or other interested parties,
>
> It's "Dotcommers" not "Dotcommoners", Eric.
>
> However this diatribe is rather dated and has very little
> mileage left. The bursting of the Dot-Com bubble is
> long over. New and/or timely and relevant themes.
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|