Re: Hold on a second, Hugh (was Re: [ga] I challenge John Palmer to a dual ..)

[Joe Baptista <baptista@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Proof? http://bit.ly/9gTXgQ

You are a TLDA director are you not? Karl Peters your Secretary and a
Director conducted the investigation. Martijn Burger provided evidence. Lots
of it. The file is 9 megs in size.

So as a TLDA director you very well know Herman Xennt's tax status or should
I say criminal record. You boys did investigate. All the Directors at the
TLDA know he owes a million guilders to the Dutch government. You admitted
as much that he had tax issues.

So - what has the TLDA done to repair the damage clearly documented above?
Are my TLD holders going to get their TLDs? Or are you going to neglect your
duties as a TLDA director? Again.

John I think your kaput.

Now I want to make clear my invitation to a challenge remains on the table.
I would rather we have this out on talk radio then continue disturbing the
business of the GA. Have courage - pick up the phone and say "howdy".

I remind you made a promise to the list to take your complaints about me to
the Baptista-Offenses list. You have broken that promise.

Also if you must speak - then can you answer one simple question. Why should
we trust the Herman Xennt root a.k.a. INAIC .. worldroot .. etc? Why should
we trust you?

I ask these questions repeatedly - I never get answers. All we get is hate.

cheers
joe baptista


On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:59 PM, John Palmer <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> wrote:

>  Well, hold on just a minute, Hugh. There are others who claim that what
> Peter and Joe are
> saying is a complete fabrication.
>
> May I ask you, Hugh, what evidence do you have that ANYTHING substantial
> that Joe and
> Peter (especially Joe) have ever said is accurate?
>
> Herman Xennt contends that there was never any issue with taxes, INAIC or
> non-INAIC related
> regarding himself.
>
> So, absent proof, and knowing Joe's not-so-stellar reputation, I think we
> need to take those claims
> of his (and his trusty sidekick Peter) with a grain of salt, or probably
> the whole salt mine.
>
> Cheers,
> John
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>
> *To:* ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; peter@xxxxxxxx
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 07, 2010 4:40 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [ga] I challenge John Palmer to a dual ..
>
>   Peter,
>
> I always like your factoids. Quite reliable in my book.  Tell one
> thing/argument I forgot:
> What was it that ICANN committed/omitted that gave some weight to
> criticism, regarding this affair?
>
>
>