Hold on a second, Hugh (was Re: [ga] I challenge John Palmer to a dual ..)

["John Palmer" <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well, hold on just a minute, Hugh. There are others who claim that what Peter 
and Joe are
saying is a complete fabrication. 

May I ask you, Hugh, what evidence do you have that ANYTHING substantial that 
Joe and
Peter (especially Joe) have ever said is accurate?

Herman Xennt contends that there was never any issue with taxes, INAIC or 
non-INAIC related
regarding himself. 

So, absent proof, and knowing Joe's not-so-stellar reputation, I think we need 
to take those claims
of his (and his trusty sidekick Peter) with a grain of salt, or probably the 
whole salt mine.

Cheers,
John
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Hugh Dierker 
  To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; peter@xxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 4:40 PM
  Subject: Re: [ga] I challenge John Palmer to a dual ..


        Peter,

        I always like your factoids. Quite reliable in my book.  Tell one 
thing/argument I forgot:
        What was it that ICANN committed/omitted that gave some weight to 
criticism, regarding this affair?