Re: Hold on a second, Hugh (was Re: [ga] I challenge John Palmer to a dual ..)

[Thomas Baxter <baxtertms@xxxxxxxxx>]

Evedince of characters: When in debate, joe stops to calling people welfare 
bumbs and insulting 
peoples familes like he did with Bradley Thonton's daughter.

How can you think any person of this type can have any truth? What would make 
you look to
the other side of this fact to accept any of their wordings?

Thoms

 BAX! Names Allentown
http://www.bax-names-allentown.com
Computer setup, training, software and services
Coming soon: BAX-Mail - free web email under the BAX TLD.




________________________________
From: John Palmer <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wed, April 7, 2010 5:29:03 PM
Subject: Hold on a second, Hugh (was Re: [ga] I challenge John Palmer to a dual 
..)

 
Well, hold on just a minute, Hugh. There are others 
who claim that what Peter and Joe are
saying is a complete fabrication. 
 
May I ask you, Hugh, what evidence do you have that 
ANYTHING substantial that Joe and
Peter (especially Joe) have ever said is 
accurate?
 
Herman Xennt contends that there was never any 
issue with taxes, INAIC or non-INAIC related
regarding himself. 
 
So, absent proof, and knowing Joe's not-so-stellar 
reputation, I think we need to take those claims
of his (and his trusty sidekick Peter) with a grain 
of salt, or probably the whole salt mine.
 
Cheers,
John
----- Original Message ----- 
>From: Hugh 
>  Dierker 
>To: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ; peter@xxxxxxxx 
>Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 4:40 
>  PM
>Subject: Re: [ga] I challenge John Palmer 
>  to a dual ..
>
>
>Peter,
> 
>I always like your factoids. Quite reliable in my book.  Tell 
>        one thing/argument I forgot:
>What was it that ICANN committed/omitted that gave some weight to 
>        criticism, regarding this 
>affair?
>
> 
>