Re: Hold on a second, Hugh (was Re: [ga] I challenge John Palmer to a dual ..)

["John Palmer" <jpalmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Oh, yes I remember this file now. It contains some text files of chat logs with 
a few people 
giving opinions. It also contains some .PDF files, all of which are corrupt - 
Adobe reader can't open them saying
that they have been mis-encoded and are not readable.

Thats 9mb of crap, Joe, not evidence. I can copy /dev/random.string to a file 
for 20 seconds and send that to
someone, but its all gibberish. 

Sorry Joe, you are the one who is cooked. If you want the posting to stop on 
the GA, let this die - stop
responding to me here.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Joe Baptista 
  To: John Palmer 
  Cc: ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 9:34 PM
  Subject: Re: Hold on a second, Hugh (was Re: [ga] I challenge John Palmer to 
a dual ..)


  Proof? http://bit.ly/9gTXgQ

  You are a TLDA director are you not? Karl Peters your Secretary and a 
Director conducted the investigation. Martijn Burger provided evidence. Lots of 
it. The file is 9 megs in size.

  So as a TLDA director you very well know Herman Xennt's tax status or should 
I say criminal record. You boys did investigate. All the Directors at the TLDA 
know he owes a million guilders to the Dutch government. You admitted as much 
that he had tax issues. 

  So - what has the TLDA done to repair the damage clearly documented above? 
Are my TLD holders going to get their TLDs? Or are you going to neglect your 
duties as a TLDA director? Again. 

  John I think your kaput.

  Now I want to make clear my invitation to a challenge remains on the table. I 
would rather we have this out on talk radio then continue disturbing the 
business of the GA. Have courage - pick up the phone and say "howdy".

  I remind you made a promise to the list to take your complaints about 
ng/argument I forgot:
            What was it that ICANN committed/omitted that gave some weight to 
criticism, regarding this affair?