Re: [ga] Re: GNSO and the GA. Kent Crispin controlled

[Hugh Dierker <hdierker2204@xxxxxxxxx>]

Andy,
 
I am sorry to report that your thoughts are appearing accurate. This time we 
were really watching for the culprit. We have shrunken the list of possibles to 
one.
 
Here is the bigger problem, of course there are changing dynamics as we speak, 
Avri believes in the theory that if you do absolutely nothing then you are 
absolutely not accountable.  This is publicly eluded to by her here and 
elsewhere. The last year of the GNSO is proof positive. This is an OK 
philosophy and was generally one half of Gandhiji's philosophy. Problem is the 
other half requiring action when duty requires it. Hence passive aggressive sit 
ins. Avri and the GNSO council would do well to have someone start them off 
here: http://www.indiaparenting.com/intelligentchild/data/048.shtml
 
Now we also know that there is one ICANN staffer that has used Debbie Garside 
in the past as a manner of censoring. He is an ex Olympic committee staffer and 
has associated through that with some very unsavory censorship and, shall we 
say "way right wing 1940s german style methodology".  More will be revealed. As 
the use of publications is just to similar.

--- On Fri, 9/11/09, Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: Andy Gardner <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ga] Re: GNSO and the GA. Kent Crispin controlled
To: "General Assembly of the DNSO" <ga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Jeffrey A. Williams" <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ssene@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 
rod_beckstrom@xxxxxxxxx, avri@xxxxxxx, Kimberly.Peretti@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Friday, September 11, 2009, 11:47 AM




Ah, Kent. A spanner in the cogs of progress since way back in the days of the 
IDNO attempts to form a constituency for Registrants. He was well-rewarded for 
his work there, don't you think?





On Sep 11, 2009, at 7:50 AM, Hugh Dierker wrote:







Joe,
 
Unless certain people in the GNSO are just outright not telling the truth.  
ICANN staff is directly responsible for denying public participation in the GA. 
Avri has repeatedly and publicly denied any interference. There is no reason to 
believe that Glen would have anything to do with such malfeasance. It just 
makes no sense the Secretariat would get involved.
 
This fellow has repeatedly bragged, no that is too harsh, boasted is better, 
that he controls the GA.  That he is the one responsible, to no one, in running 
the only General Assembly list in ICANN.  And that he has shut it down.  Kent 
Crispin; http://www.icann.org/en/biog/crispin.htm
 
This of course is in direct violations of the history and mandate found in the 
preamble here;
http://www.geolang.com/draftGAListRules5.htm ;
These are legal and scrutinzed by high priced lawyers and formally adopted by a 
contracting agent of the United States Government.
 
Which is further explained here:
http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/ ; --- 2007 9 06 2 
Again the self determination of the GA is established in a legally binding 
document.
 
(as you can see from this, after fancy lawyering and removal of language -- the 
GNSO adoption, formally of the list rules took out the role of the GNSO Chair 
and effectively in a legal ICANN document made me {although yet to be elected} 
a god) Not fun.
 
Avri I note in an election last December was elected until a new board is 
formed. Me -- I get no relief.